Disputatio Usoris:Helveticus montanus

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ciao, Massimo. Questa è la nostra template di binvenuto:

Salve!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!


Si hai domandi, vai qui. Salutamu!--Ioshus Rocchio 20:44, 23 Iulii 2006 (UTC)

Index

Disputatio Usoris:Helveticus montanus (2006-2012)[fontem recensere]

Buon Anno dalla Bassa Lodigiana[fontem recensere]

Un abbraccio e a presto. Per favore, mi guarderesti Ludovicus Carolus Prates e Sanctiacobi Brasiliae? Grazie mille

A presto

Rex Momo (disputatio) 12:17, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year from me too[fontem recensere]

I noticed your articles about Claudius Nobs and Aaron Swartz. If you care to, you could add any recent deaths like these to the page Formula:Nuntii. Sometimes I add a reference to a newspaper, but there's no need to do this if we already have an article about the person.

And then, again if you want to, you could copy them into Formula:Aliquidnovi: this is displayed on the Pagina Prima and is intended for about 2/3 items, so, if you add a latest one, you could take the earliest one away.

It's your choice! If you don't do this, I probably will use your material and do it later in the day. All good wishes -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 13 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

Bassem Youssef[fontem recensere]

Ciao caro, come stai? Passato bene le ferie?

Ti chiedo una brevissima rilettura di questo articoletto che ho appena creato, quando avessi 5 minuti.

Grazie mille per l'aiuto.

A presto

Rex Momo (disputatio) 12:23, 22 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

Intervista su wikipedia in latino.[fontem recensere]

Ciao sono un giornalista, collaboro con l'edizione italiana di vice.com. Sono interessato a intervistare qualcuno che sia coinvolto nel progetto di wikipedia in latino. Il progetto mi sembra interessante e nella lista degli "usores" sei l'unico di madrelingua italiana. Più che un'intervista sarebbe una chicacchierata. Non dovrebbe prenderti troppo tempo al massimo una mezzoretta su skype. Fammi sapere cosa ne pensi. Grazie

Per me in linea di massima va bene anche vorrei conoscere cortesemente i dettagli nel senso di cosa si occupa il vostro sito, perchè c'è interesse per questo progetto, dove apparirà l'intervista e come ecc. Fammi sapere i tuoi estremi a partire dal nome e poi ci metteremo in contatto via skype Buona giornataHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 05:11, 30 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

Hai ragione, ti spiego meglio. Vice è una rivista che nasce in Canada ma che ha edizioni in altre lingue. Esce sia su carta (una volta al mese) che online (aggiornato continuamente con nuovi articoli). Gli argomenti che tratta sono disparati ma possono rientrare nella categoria classica "costume e società". L'intervista che ho pensato è per l'edizione italiana ma essendo un network i responsabili possono tradurla in altre lingue per le altre edizioni. Mi è venuto in mente di intervistare qualcuno che curasse wikipedia in latino perchè mi sembra un progetto curioso. Leggo continuamente wikipedia e cambio spesso lingua alla voce che consulto, così mi sono accorto dell'edizione in latino. Ho cercato un po' di dati e sono rimasto sbalordito dal numero di voci e di utenti. Mi sembra un fatto curioso e allo stesso tempo nobile quello di gestire un'enciclopedia in una lingua che non è più parlata. Vorrei sapere cosa vi muove a contribuire al progetto; se siete dei latinisti, dei professori o dei semplici appassionati; come fate a tradurre le cose più moderne; etc. Ho pensato a domande di questo tipo, niente di troppo tecnico. Diciamo che è un'intervista a qualcuno che collabora attivamente con wikipedia, non ha qualcuno che sa tutto su wikipedia. Ma ti ripeto è una chiacchierata, se leggi gli articoli e le interviste pubblicate sull'edizione italiana di Vice ti accorgi che il tono è molto rilassato. Io mi chiamo Gabriele e il mio contatto skype è gabriele.carracoy Questa è la voce su Vice di wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_%28magazine%29

per te potrebbe andare bene durante la finesettimana? Ho skype solo a casa e in questi giorni sono oltretutto molto preso con il lavoro oppure stasera dopo le 21.00, ma in quest'ultimo caso più per conoscersi per una prima presa di contatto il mio indirizzo skype è massimo.macconi

Io stasera non posso però intanto ti aggiungo su skype. Il fine settimana per me va bene. Fammi sapere quando è più comodo per te, considera che l'intervista durerà al massimo mezz'ora.

domani sabato mattina attorno alle 9:00, ho cercato il contatto su skype ma non funziona

Per me domani mattina (sabato) alle 9:00 va bene. Ti ho aggiunto su skype, dovrebbe esserti arrivata una richiesta di contatto.

scusa non mi è arrivata nessuna richiesta su skype

Sei sicuro che il tuo contatto sia esattamente massimo.macconi? Perchè ce ne è uno simile che si chiama massimo.macconi47 ed è svizzero . Intanto se vuoi prova te ad aggiungermi il mio nome skype è gabriele.carracoy

si hai ragione è massimo.macconi47 scusa ma non uso molto skype, se spostassimo verso le 10:00 è un problema?
visto che non ho una tua risposta restiamo per le 9:00 potrei avere qualche minuto di ritardo mi avvisi quando ti stai collegando allo 0041794675781/0041799332500 scusami ma devo fare un lavoro urgente. Ciao a dopo 9:00 circa
dovrei farcela lascio l'ufficio e torno a casa dove ho skype installato--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 07:52, 2 Februarii 2013 (UTC)

Sono davanti al PC ma non trovo il tuo contatto skype riprova tu con il mio che è quello che dici tu massimo.macconi47 grazie--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 08:04, 2 Februarii 2013 (UTC)

Caro Gabriele ora esco 15 min. Tornerò e sarò a casa fin verso le 12:00, dopo di che sarò a Milano e quindi dovremo rinviare a domattina. Ciao
non sento più niente va beh sopra ai tutti gli estremi dove contttarmi aggiungo n° italiano mi pare (non lo uso spesso) 00.39.339.316.18.54. Ciao

Fatoumata Diawara[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, tutto bene?

Per favore, mi daresti una rilettura veloce a questa nuova pagina che ho creato? È poca roba.... GRAZIE!!!

Rex Momo (disputatio) 10:28, 7 Martii 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo! I happened to notice that a couple of your recent pages (Armandus Trovajoli and Charrais) aren't properly linked on other Wikipedias. May I ask: have you added them to Wikidata yet? It's necessary to do this, just as it used to be necessary to add a link directly on another wikipedia. Luckily it's even quicker to do it than it used to be! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:17, 11 Martii 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll explain. It's easier than the old system -- but different. This is what you do:
  1. Save your new Latin page. No need to paste any interwiki links to it. Copy (into your computer memory) the title of the page.
  2. Go back to the barbarian page you worked from (French, English, Italian ... it doesn't matter). Don't edit, but look at the list of interwiki links, and click the grey words "Edit links" or "Modifica links". That takes you to Wikidata. Wait a moment, till you see the Wikidata page, and the list of interwikis.
  3. At the bottom of the list of interwikis, click "add".
  4. In column 1, type "la" for Latin.
  5. In column 2, paste in the title that you have in your memory. (Wikidata will check while you watch -- this is why you must save your new page and copy the title, step 1 above, before doing this.)
  6. Click "save".
Try it -- it's really quick :) Tell me if this doesn't make sense! Have a good day, Massimo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:55, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
I have understood but I do not believe it's quicker than it used to be. Before I have not to work on the barbarian page, all went automatically. However if I understand you correctly with the old way it doesn't work anymore, therefore I have no choice, or is there an alternative? Thank you again for your precious help--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 09:54, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
It becomes quicker, I find ... I think it is necessary -- otherwise it might take a long time for bots to find our page. But perhaps others will have a different opinion. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:11, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
Changes are happening all around us, it seems, apparently without leaving a trace inter "Nuper mutata." Those wily bots have already found most of the articles I've just marked {{geometria-stipula}}. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:23, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
That's reassuring, certainly. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:30, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
The one I checked had indeed left a trace in the article's history on the 10th of the month, but no record that a change had happened appears in the appropriate time-slot in the "Nuper mutata." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:46, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
Odd ... As you know, I left a message about this on your talk page as well. I'd be very happy to be wrong! If the bots will do it all for us, that leaves more time for writing Latin. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:16, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
Maybe you two are wiser than I am and it's OK after all. No need to do anything hastily -- let's wait and see. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:25, 13 Martii 2013 (UTC)
Yes, sorry, it seems I had no need to worry about this. See my note at Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:11, 25 Martii 2013 (UTC)
To answer your question, Massimo, I believe it still works very quickly (just as it always did) if we add a link to :la on one other Wikipedia (French, Italian, English, whatever we choose) and one link on our own new Latin page. Going to Wikidata is fine, but it is optional (and I agree, it always takes a bit longer). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:03, 25 Martii 2013 (UTC)

New pope soon ...[fontem recensere]

As you have seen, Massimo, I have been updating and expanding some of your articles about cardinals, especially the ones who are Papabiles dicti. But they are still very short, of course. I wonder which one of us will be active on Vicipaedia when the news comes? Interesting ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:25, 13 Martii 2013 (UTC)

Beth Carvalho[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, tutto bene? Per favore, mi daresti un'occhiata a questa nuova pagina che ho appena creato? È una colonna portante del Samba, e l'ho inserita in Samba per non lasciare la pagina orfana.

Grazie mille per l'aiuto

Rex Momo (disputatio) 20:23, 2 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)

Paramore[fontem recensere]

Greetings, Massimo. I marked these two pages "Non latine": as I'm sure you saw for yourself, the text of them makes no sense at all(probably Google translation?) I saw you had done some work on them. Of course, if you want to improve them further, no problem! Best wishes -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:44, 7 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)

Shaolin[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, tutto bene? Sta arrivando la primavera anche lì da te?

Ti chiederei, per favore, 5-7 minuti del tuo tempo per rileggere questa pagina che ho appena creata. Fatti sentire ogni tanto!

Grazie mille per l'aiuto!

Rex Momo (disputatio) 13:35, 9 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)

Signore delle cime[fontem recensere]

Grazie mille, caro, ma.... tutto il resto dell'articolo l'ho fatto bene?

Grazie ancora, a presto

Rex Momo (disputatio) 16:23, 1 Maii 2013 (UTC)

Merchant ivory[fontem recensere]

Hello again, Massimo. If you are adding more pages about Merchant Ivory films, you can add to them two more categories that I have just created: Categoria:Pelliculae Merchant Ivory and (if Ruth Prawer Jhabvala wrote the screenplay) Categoria:Ruth Prawer Jhabvala. Happy editing! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:16, 7 Maii 2013 (UTC)

Grazie mille[fontem recensere]

... per aver limato le mie aggiunte a papa Tawadros e papa Francesco! Rex Momo (disputatio) 15:38, 12 Maii 2013 (UTC)

De novissimis[fontem recensere]

Thank you for adding news items, Massimo! I was away from my computer, and it was good to see that you have been refreshing Formula:Aliquidnovi and Formula:Nuntii regularly. But I took this one out:

because I think there must be something wrong. Who said this? If Victor Orban, he should be "minister primus", nominative; if Angela Merkel, she should be "ministra prima", nominative -- but they are both accusative. Also, is it "criticised with a sharp judgment"? If so, "acri/acerbo iudicio"? I wasn't really sure, so I took it out. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:37, 22 Maii 2013 (UTC)

John Cale[fontem recensere]

Hi, I noticed that you have created article about John Lee Hooker. Thank you for them. Should I request to you, you would want to create at least a short article for John Cale (endefr) (founding member of The Velvet Underground)? Thank you in advance for any resolution. --Marek Koudelka (disputatio) 15:06, 26 Maii 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Marek Koudelka (disputatio) 17:11, 26 Maii 2013 (UTC)

[fontem recensere]

Salve Helvetice. :) Scisne si littera maiuscula in "montanus" voles habere, movere potes? -- Donatello (disputatio) 21:25, 6 Iunii 2013 (UTC).

Ioachimus Barreiros[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, come stai? Vacanze, già iniziate?

Ho la questa pagina di questo popolarissimo cantante portoghese. Ti chiedo 5 minuti per una breve rilettura, per favore. Buon fine settimana

Grazie mille

Rei Momo (disputatio) 06:06, 28 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Hadriatica[fontem recensere]

Greetings, Massimo. If you are creating more pages about small places in Croatia, you can give them the category Categoria:Loci habitati Croatiae which I have just created. There is also Categoria:Insulae Croatiae if you add any more islands. Have a good weekend! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:50, 29 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Grazie[fontem recensere]

Grazie mille per l'aiuto offertomi, ma in realtà è già da qualche mese che scrivo su Wikipedia, in latino e in italiano, senza essere registrato; se avrò bisogno di supporto conterò su di te! Gratias tibi ago, vale! Usor:Udine2812 (disputatio)

May I suggest ...?[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. I have the impression the pages about Italian dioceses are yours -- is that right? I'm very glad you are doing them. May I suggest a couple of changes in your model? (1) No need to link to the Italian wikipedia in the text -- I know people sometimes do it, but we have agreed that it isn't necessary because there will be an interwiki link anyway, so I think it's a waste of your time (2) You can always add a category for the city -- I think I have done this now for all existing pages; (3) you could move around the verbs a little bit. I suggest "... est sedes episcopalis", then remove the est later "... Catholicae Romanae est, in regione ...", and then add another "est" at "cuius caput est urbs ...". Is that OK, do you think? Have a good weekend -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:53, 6 Iulii 2013 (UTC)

Help![fontem recensere]

Hello again, Massimo. I have added a couple of suggestions at Disputatio:Museum Artis - MdAO. I'm sure the contributor doesn't understand Latin. Could you add an explanation in Italian? I wanted to say: if he/she adds a long list of names of artists unknown to us, it's necessary to say something about them or about the painting in the gallery. Otherwise, people won't read it. Also, can he/she put an image on Commons (of the gallery, or of a painting) that we could use in the article? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:36, 25 Augusti 2013 (UTC)

Baden-Wurttemberg[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. Looking through the new pages, I have just come to the first of your pages about "communia" in Baden-Wurttemberg. I think there are two problems with these pages.

One is that they have no incoming link (so they are all "pagina non annexa" at present). The way to solve this, I suppose, would be to create a list of "communia" (if that is the best word) in Baden-Wurttemberg, like you have made lists of communes in each French department. Without incoming links, they are really non-stipula.

The other problem is that you didn't make a category for these pages. One series, from Abstatt to Bärenthal, are just in the category Categoria:Badenia-Virtembergia with nothing to indicate that they are "Urbes" or "Loci habitati" or "Communia" or whatever. Then there is another, shorter, series, running from Abtsgmünd to Blaustein, which are in Categoria:Urbes Badeniae-Virtembergiae -- I don't know why the difference!

Somehow we need to sort this out, I think. Maybe Schulz-Hameln will have a suggestion for what the category name should be. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:04, 5 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

I think, we could create the category "communia Badeniae-Virtembergiae", to which all political communities belong. The big cities should be a subcategory of "communia". The incoming links could be created by pages about the "Landkreis" (district), to which the municipalities belong, like I did for Lower Saxony. (see for example Circulus Luneburgensis). These circuli could be connected with a formula and an index like Index circulorum et liberarum urbium Saxoniae Inferioris. Furthermore there is an index of the carplates of Germany Pagorum Germanicorum index notarum autocinetorum. So there would be no "orphans".--Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 16:51, 6 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to you, Schulz-Hameln, and to Massimo for the additions he has now made. As far as I'm concerned, no problem remains. Perhaps someone with a bot could run through the pages listed in Index Communium Badeniae-Virtembergiae, and, where those pages are currently in supercategory Categoria:Badenia-Virtembergia, move them to Categoria:Communia Badeniae-Virtembergiae. Is that possible? There are about 90 of them. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:45, 7 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
Done! --UV (disputatio) 21:40, 7 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Hello again Massimo. Still looking through the new pages, I noticed four where you translated the German word "Schloss" as "oppidum" in picture captions. This doesn't usually work, I think. A Schloss is a castle, "castellum"; a Stadt is a town, "oppidum". I'm quite sure you know this really ... ! Greetings from Poitou -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:43, 11 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

I found a similar one among the French communes today -- at Noiron, where the picture of a château was captioned "oppidum". Do you think you may have done it often? Do we perhaps need to search for them somehow?
Hope you're OK, Massimo. I took a load of apples to the press yesterday and came back with 140 bottles of apple juice ... Now we have to drink it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:06, 12 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Iceland[fontem recensere]

I was also just looking at your pages for small towns in Iceland. I don't know where you found them -- but it wasn't a good list. Some are "communia" and some are not. Heimaey, for example, is a small town on an island, not a commune or a municipium. But don't worry about these :) There were only a few, so I have checked and corrected them, and listed them on the page Islandia to make an incoming link. It's probably a good idea to work from a proper list, and then to make the list itself into a Vicipaedia page, so that there will always be a link to each page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:09, 5 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Adriana Seroni[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, tutto bene? Fa già freddo lì da te.... come qui?

Ho appena creato questa pagina, e ti chiederei la gentilezza di qualche minuto per una rilettura dei miei errori.

Grazie mille per l'aiuto di sempre.... e a presto!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 21:51, 8 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Tibi, sicut semper, gratias ago. Adiutum tuum mihi semper magnum munus est! Rei Momo (disputatio) 15:46, 13 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

Sede vacante[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. I admire the way you continue to add news items -- and also places in France -- and in Germany -- and also biographies -- and more! I thought I would mention to you that I am travelling to Greece tomorrow, especially Thessalonica and Paros, so I will probably not add any news, or anything else, for the next two weeks. Maybe there will be more sunshine in Greece than there is here. All good wishes -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:20, 3 Novembris 2013 (UTC)

Politicorum periti > Politici[fontem recensere]

I noticed a few categories "Politicorum periti ..." in your latest biographies. You might like to remember that we finally changed all these to "Politici ...". Nice and short! Maybe you can change your models to match this new style. Best wishes, Massimo -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:05, 11 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

And there's another way you could change your models. Whenever you are writing a biography of an American, instead of adding the category for the state they come from (like Categoria:Pennsilvania) you can make it an "Incolae" category (like Categoria:Incolae Pennsilvaniae). After waiting for ages for some American or other to do it, I just went ahead and created all fifty of those categories a couple of years ago.
I'll be away from computers for the next few days, after tomorrow. I wonder whether we'll reach 100,000 in that time -- and whether the 100,000th page will be one of yours? We'll see ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:24, 13 Decembris 2013 (UTC)
We did reach 100,000! And it was one of yours! Well done, Massimo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:50, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

Iter musicale[fontem recensere]

Salve Helvetice. De "iter musicale" scribebas pro anglicae tour in commentatione Madonnae; nescio si vocabulum e fontem capiebas, sed modo certa re, Norstedt Suetice-Latine Dictionarium habet "circumcursio". -- Donatello (disputatio) 16:19, 15 Decembris 2013 (UTC).

Circumcursio = 'Late Latin', non Latina classica. Vocabula Latina classica (apud Cassell's): iter, peregrinatio, lustratio, et ut videtur circuitus 'a going round in a circle, circuit . . . a roundabout way, circuitous course'. Vide Circuitus Franciae. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 18:24, 15 Decembris 2013 (UTC)
Praeterea, musicalis, -e, non est vocabulum classicum. Vide musicus, -a, -um. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 18:06, 15 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

Una biblioteca di epub tratta da la:wikisource[fontem recensere]

Nell'ambito del it:Progetto:Sestopedia ho proposto, specialmente per i licei locali una biblioteca con i link ai testi in latino, generati in formato epub, corredata, se si crede, anche di copie cashe presso la biblioteca comunale e presso il consorzio bibliotecario a cui aderisce.vedi qui la bozza. Credi che la cosa possa essere replicata anche nel Canton Ticino? La:Wikipedia potrebbe essere di supporto per i riferimenti?-Mizardellorsa (disputatio) 08:29, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

Francus Trappoli[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, come stai? Buon Anno.... un po' in ritardo!!!

Ho appena creato questa pagina, per favore, mi daresti un'occhiatina? Grazie mille per l'aiuto!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:53, 12 Februarii 2014 (UTC)

I moved again ...[fontem recensere]

... from "Vexillum Russicum " to "Insigne Russicum". It's not a flag, I think, it's a coat of arms, and insigne seems to be our usual word for that. Hope that's OK, Massimo. Greetings from Poitou! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:32, 19 Martii 2014 (UTC)

Can you help?[fontem recensere]

Greetings, Massimo. Sacreum made a bit of a mess today, and I have spent a little time mopping it up. I have blocked the account for one day, and I explained why at Disputatio Usoris:Sacreum, but I have the impression that Sacreum is not really very good at Latin. Could you perhaps add, on that same disputatio page, an explanation in Italian? I will tell you here what I intended to say, and then maybe you could add the Italian translation? Thank you very much for your help, Massimo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:15, 26 Martii 2014 (UTC)

I blocked you because you were making systematic changes without discussion. The names you changed were Sanskrit, not Latin, and there is no reason to change the international transliteration of Sanskrit. I want to add that it is necessary to talk politely to other Vicipaedians, and especially if you want to make changes in their work.
I have read your disputatio page, and I see many comments from other Vicipaedians, with no reply from you. If you want to continue your work with us, you will need to talk to others. If you don't follow this advice, we could impose a longer block -- but I don't want to, because you have done really useful work on Italian geography.

Thank you again, Massimo. I am always amazed how you manage to find the time to add so much to Vicipaedia -- especially when you are so busy in what they call "the real world". As for me, yes, I'm OK. I will perhaps be busy soon: I have been elected to the municipal council of Sanctus Constantius. But it is a very small commune! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:57, 26 Martii 2014 (UTC)

About the Disney films[fontem recensere]

Hello again, Massimo. Notice what I have written at Disputatio Usoris:195.67.67.130. If you are willing to go on helping with those pages, this is very good, but think about it -- there are so many, and they are so bad! The Latin is just copied from one to the next, and any new Latin is nonsense! You can add a comment on that talk page if you wish, and if you think I was wrong, please go ahead and unblock the address: no problem. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:28, 29 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

Borloo et ego[fontem recensere]

I have been more interested in French politicians recently, therefore I was happy to see your new page for Ioannes Ludovicus Borloo. The reason for my interest is that, yes, I was elected. Hmm. Sanctus Constantius is a very small commune, but it has very long meetings ... Greetings from Poitou, Massimo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:41, 24 Maii 2014 (UTC)

I'm not a politician but also as a lawyer I unfortunately know as absurdly long some work's meetings and private association meeting can be. Have a nice SundayHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 19:16, 24 Maii 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for Michaela Alliot-Marie and Bernardus Kouchner. I have added information to both! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:04, 30 Maii 2014 (UTC)

Orissa[fontem recensere]

I moved Odisha on again to Odisa. which is closer to the Indian (Hindi and Sanskrit) name. I hope that's OK with you, Massimo. I think you were right to move, but there was no need for us to follow the English spelling exactly -- the less English, the better! Please tell me if you don't agree. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:30, 1 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

De indicibus praefecturarum Francicarum[fontem recensere]

Salve Helvetice! Indices praefecturarum Francicarum tibi, ut videtur, auctori debemus. Proxima nocte in illis paginis quaedam quoad grammaticam nec non quoad nexus mutavi. Praeterea cogito, an exordia illarum paginarum fortasse elegeantiora sint, si ita legantur, ut hic demonstravisse volui. An probabis? Neque enim has mutationes te invito fieri velim. Laurentianus (disputatio) 07:26, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

Gratias tibi ago, Helvetice, maximas pro consensu tuo in disputatione mea collato. Ita ergo faciam, quamprimum tempus admittet. Laurentianus (disputatio) 12:01, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

Away[fontem recensere]

I'm off travelling for two weeks, Massimo. First Oxonia, then Sancta Monica. You won't see me often on Vicipaedia till I return. I hope you are having a good summer? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:19, 10 Iulii 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I'm back! Not exactly a holiday: I was giving a lecture at the Villa Getty. But it's true, there was some time to relax also ... and the sun was shining. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:56, 24 Iulii 2014 (UTC)

De Dachau[fontem recensere]

Confusionem evasum, puto nos, rem Dachau in Dachanum (Francia) movere debere. Quomodo autem putas? --Theodor (disputatio) 11:18, 6 Augusti 2014 (UTC).

Feriae?[fontem recensere]

I notice your absence, Massimo. You're on holiday, perhaps? Hope you are having a good time Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:09, 4 Septembris 2014 (UTC)

It's nice to see you again! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:41, 11 Novembris 2014 (UTC)
Good to see you back! All the best, --UV (disputatio) 20:50, 4 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
I had a feeling that those new cardinals might interest you! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:55, 4 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

en:Do not buy Russian goods![fontem recensere]

Hello! Could you translate an article about boycott of Russian goods in Ukraine for the Latin and Italian Wikipedia? Thanks for the help. --Trydence (disputatio) 14:57, 11 Octobris 2014 (UTC)

Global account[fontem recensere]

Salve Helveticus montanus! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Vale, —DerHexer (Disp.) 20:38, 3 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

Soanus Patita Paini Mafi[fontem recensere]

Grazie... e Buon Anno!!! Rei Momo (disputatio) 22:39, 4 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

Hope this is useful[fontem recensere]

Massimo, it's really good to see you working with us again. I hope all is well with you. I want to mention an item that you often use in "Nexus externi", because it is not always really very useful: PND -- the German "National Library". I think I mentioned this to you before, long ago. It is simply a catalogue of recent books in German. Therefore, probably very useful to our readers if it is about a German subject, but not useful otherwise.

I mention this today because I noticed the page Maria Anna Fitzherbert. A very good page to have, but it has only the one PND link. That link only tells you about one relevant book, translated from English into German. That's not much use to Latin Vicipaedia readers. Normally, if I saw that link on a page about someone who is not German, I would delete it as not relevant -- but I haven't, because if I delete it, there's no source at all and the page is a "Non stipula"! Much better to cite a web page about her, or a book about her. I hope you don't mind me making this comment!

It's cold and wet here, Massimo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:00, 29 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

I am adding some references to "Mrs Fitzherbert" myself now, so don't worry about i! I will tell you a story about that. I once had in my hands two very personal and painful letters (the original manuscripts) written by Mrs Fitzherbert to the Prince of Wales (George IV). I found them between the pages of a library copy of the book by Shane Leslie which I have now cited on that page. I can guess why they were there: someone before me went to see the letters, had this library book with him, was comparing the text, and left the letters inside the book!
So I found out where the collection of her letters was, and asked the archivists whether these were missing. They hadn't noticed. I wonder how often such things happen! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:22, 29 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
Good heavens, Massimo! How many more pages do you have already on your PC? Latin will soon be the biggest Wikipedia at this rate!! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:26, 29 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comment on my talk page, Massimo. I am glad you think these formulae are useful. There is more work to be done yet. I am sure you understand, my real aim (since there are only a few Vicipaedians!) is to save the time that is spent on infoboxes, so that there is more time to write pages. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:23, 15 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Non stipulae[fontem recensere]

I'm very sorry, Massimo, but going through the new pages for 27th and 28th January I found a lot of your biographies that were "non stipula", mostly because there was no external source. Maybe these were old work? Sometimes there was a link but it was dead. There were also a lot of pages by other people during that period, sometimes very bad pages, so I was only able to correct a few -- I had no time to do more! I suggest, to save those pages, you need to take a little time to find an external source for each.

I am in a rush right now, otherwise I would do more to help. We are travelling to England tomorrow. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:18, 19 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

If I have time in the next few days I will look for sources for some of these pages myself, especially the botanists and academics. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:28, 20 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
Meanwhile Iacobus has marked quite a lot of my old pages "Non stipula". Touché! So I will spend some time rescuing some of my pages, and I may not have very much time for yours ... We'll see! Best wishes, Massimo Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:56, 22 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
I hadn't realized they were yours! I was merely using the random-page generator and marking problematic pages that turned up. As I said in Taberna, many of these should be saved; indeed, certain ones, like Lacus, would be necessary for any encyclopedia to have! In general, faulty or absent sourcing was the main observed issue. It was amazing to find pages from six or seven years ago that were nothing but one (short) sentence and hadn't been challenged. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:07, 22 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Massimo, I want to suggest a thought to you. Is it a good idea to go on creating so many very short entries for French communes? Think about it: when you have finished, there will be 36,797 of them. Most of them have only one source. Most of them only have the French name, except a few hundred for which one of us (usually me or Leonellus or Thbdgrrd or Lesgles) has found the Latin name.

If that one link changes, or the source disappears, nearly all the pages will be non-stipula and threatened with deletion. It could soon happen, because French communes are certain to be merged whenever the government can make up its mind about anything. Afterwards, that official website will probably be redesigned to give information on the new, big communes, and the old ones will disappear from it because they are merely historical.

So, what I'm thinking is, maybe really it's a better idea to go back to some of our existing pages and improve them? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Massimo. Since you ask me those questions on my talk page, I will try to answer them:
  1. "why had all wikipedias used in the past (but also now) the pages on the French Communes to enhance their quantity of articles?" Because it is easy to do with a bot.
  2. "are you sure that in the future with bots we could not add new external sources or change the pages of the no more existing communes?" No, I am not sure, and we do not know the future of French communes anyway -- president Hollande has not the faintest idea what he will do next -- but I think it would be very difficult for a bot to take these short articles about current communes and create good articles about the future subdivisions.
  3. "if nobody adds new articles, how can we increase these Wikipedia?" We do it by improving older articles. I have worked on many, many of your old articles, about Popes and actors and scientists and Reformation figures and many other topics.
  4. "I would do with pleasure other less dull and boring work" Then please, please, Massimo, help to improve some older articles. It is not quite so boring. The more you add, the better they look!
Massimo, I'm really sorry if my message upset you. I just wanted to suggest that you think about this question, but I don't want you to stop work here! Who will watch for vandals better than you? Who, better than you, will help to make those new pages, created by anonyms who know no Latin, into pages that are good for Vicipaedia? You do this really well, Massimo. Please don't stop! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:42, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)
The random-page generator, given a chance (so to speak), will readily give us one of these communes. In general, they look like successful stubs to me (short though they be), and so I don't mark them "Non stipula," unless by a fluke or in error. (If they have more than 2000 characters, I even remove the stipula mark, because they look like more than stubs, having all the other requisite parts.) As historical facts, they deserve encyclopedic recognition, just as the English historical counties do. Of course they're small potatoes; I once thought Caychax, with twelve inhabitants, took the cake, but then an example with eight inhabitants turned up. The best way to improve one's Latin is probably to write articles on a variety of topics, but some contributors have other goals, and we shouldn't forget that they're also said (by the poet) to serve who only stand and wait. Maybe just before the communes are added, they could be googled for evidence so as to have an extra source or two. Otherwise these topics are beyond my ken, so I'll bow out and let you continue talking. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:27, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)

I just found a handy, academic-looking biographical site on Brazilian politicians. I'm going to start on your Brazilian presidents, Massimo. It shouldn't take long. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:00, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)

At least some of the commune pages do seem to have outdated links. For example, the link at Lasserre-de-Prouille ends up at the general census page, whereas it should go to the commune file. That is probably due to sloppy site management at INSEE, and it was easy enough for me to find, but technically one might argue that the page is now unsourced. A bot might be able to fix these.
We should eventually have pages on all towns of a certain size or rank. I doubt any readers are really using Vicipaedia as a source for French geography, but their existence helps to connect other articles. Note, however, that many large French towns still do not have articles, not to mention even larger cities across the world.
I would estimate that at least 80% of the French communes have Latin names, which can often be found in the various dictionnaires topographiques, e.g. [1]. Adding those is one way in which Vicipaedia can stand out from the other language editions.
But I think we all agree that editors here should do the work that they want to do! Lesgles (disputatio) 20:21, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)
Dear Leagles I remarked the problem with INSEE and I'm correcting it slowly. The sense of my observations was exactly summed up by your last words "editors here should do the work that they want to do"--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 21:17, 2 Martii 2015 (UTC)
My intuitive take on "non stipula" has been that, in practice, only preposterous "contributions" consisting of a few precipitate words exhibiting hideous Latinity and feeble Sachkenntnis deserve being marked with this formula. Therefore I'm a bit surprised at such a proliferation of "non stipula" tags. I think Massimo has done very great job in what he has been doing. To me, one of the charms of Vicipaedia has been that we editors, a bunch of great personalities, are allowed to enrich Vicipaedia in such a way and with such contributions that correspond to each one's interests and indoles. I'm not sure that the deletionist stance we're witnesssing now will bring with it such goodies as some of us may imagine. I'm all for good quality, but I'm by far more anxious about (and sometimes even ashamed of) the poor Latinity in some of our articles than about whether a given article has all the paraphernalia dictated by the formula. Neander (disputatio) 07:30, 3 Martii 2015 (UTC)
I fully agree with Neander. Should I make a choice I prefer a short but correct page in Latin without all the paraphernalia than longer pages written sometimes even with an automatic translator. In the first case actualy it's easy for each of us to ameliorate the page and - if it's the case - also the language. In the second case I personally seldom have time to correct them. I thank you Andrew to have given us the possibility to discuss this matterHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 09:13, 3 Martii 2015 (UTC)
It's a pleasure! I agree, too, that it is better to have good short pages than bad long ones. I like brevity, even Larousse-style brevity. Many pages on the English Wikipedia (and others) are much too long.
I raised this specific issue because I think we need to defend our work against the future, just a little bit. The pages about communes were an example, but I could have named the pages I have created about Categoria:Cenae and about books, also the pages both Massimo and I have created about paintings, also the pages about asteroids created by Robert's bot, etc. These pages are, potentially, a great strength of Vicipaedia -- but the weaker they are, the more likely they are to succumb to a deletionist stance in the future. We need to give them a good start in life! But there is so little time, I know, and we all do the work we want to do. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:46, 3 Martii 2015 (UTC)
I ought to have predicted this: whether as a result of my hasty words or not, you are working at Vicipaedia harder than ever! You really are making Vicipaedia grow, Massimo. You may have noticed, I also am adding material to some of those older articles of yours. Exagimus monumentum aere perennius (touch wood, as the English say).
It is sunny and warm here. I have only a few more days to prune my apple trees; the sap will be rising! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:38, 9 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Re:Thanks[fontem recensere]

Please, being in your community is an honour for me ;) there are not many people here, right? :( P.S. Ma sei italiano? XD --Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 13:43, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Io italiano proprio, scrivo da vicino Roma...--Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 13:47, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)
(Mi chiamo Alessandro :) piacere, Massimo!)
Che coincidenza... --Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 14:06, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)
Grazie :) be', comunque anche se ci fosse non penso ci potrei andare, Roma è in realtà a mezz'ora di macchina da qui e non sono maggiorenne, per di più...--Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 14:09, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)
Ho paura di essere un caso unico purtroppo XD--Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 14:15, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)
Be', spero di essere alla vostra altezza, od almeno di potervi arrivare (ho ancora un bel po' di studio davanti) ;) --Toadino2日本 Velisne theamfungi sapore? 14:23, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)
Be', ne sono contento ✌️Ho già cominciato bene dunque... comunque gradirò senz'altro avvertimento d'esperti :)

Paulus Evaristus Arns[fontem recensere]

Almeno lo avessi conosciuto!!! Ho fatto qualcosa, ma poco :-). Comunque, tu, nel tu Latino perfetto, potresti dire che, assieme a Benedetto XVI e al cardinale americano Baum, sono gli unici tre cardinali viventi creati da Paolo VI!

Ciao, buon fine settimana :-)

Rei Momo (disputatio) 18:29, 20 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Yeaaahhh :-), bravissimo, buon fine settimana!!! Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:29, 21 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Gulielmus Wakefield Baum[fontem recensere]

Ah, volevo dirti che ho aggiunto qualcosina anche qui. Ho inseirot il suo titoloa ttuale che risulta da Catholic Hierarchy. Grazie mille, e buon fine settimana!!! :-)

Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:53, 21 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Translating the interface in your language, we need your help[fontem recensere]

Hello Helveticus montanus, thanks for working on this wiki in your language. We updated the list of priority translations and I write you to let you know. The language used by this wiki (or by you in your preferences) needs about 100 translations or less in the priority list. You're almost done!
To add or change translations for all wikis, please use translatewiki.net, the MediaWiki localisation project.

Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:06, 26 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)

Hello Helveticus[fontem recensere]

Hello Helveticus. Can you translate some Georgia-related articles for Latin Wiki? Can you help? Jaqeli (disputatio) 20:00, 1 Maii 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you please translate into Latin this, this and this? I mean even a small translations would be great help. Jaqeli (disputatio) 12:18, 2 Maii 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Helveticus again. Jaqeli (disputatio) 19:09, 2 Maii 2015 (UTC)
Hi Helveticus, anything on the translation in Italian Wiki? Jaqeli (disputatio) 14:27, 12 Maii 2015 (UTC)
Can you please respond? Jaqeli (disputatio) 09:40, 19 Maii 2015 (UTC)

117,000[fontem recensere]

Well done, Massimo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:27, 29 Maii 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Massimo,. I am checking new pages as usual and I notice that some of the communes of Guadeloupe (for example, Morne-à-l'Eau -- but others too) have been placed in the wrong category, Categoria:Communia praefecturae Guianae. I think you need to check and correct these. Bad luck! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:57, 31 Maii 2015 (UTC)

American comic actors[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. I realise that we need to be much more careful with the new pages about American comic actors. The anonymous editor adding these pages knows no Latin at all. The place of birth is always wrong. They are all categorized as having committed suicide, but in fact they are alive. There are other errrors too. There is never any source except IMDb, which is not reliable. It is nice of you to edit the pages -- I have been doing it too -- but in fact we are making Vicipaedia worse! We must either spend more time checking each page, or else delete them. What do you think is best?

I notice they are being added to dozens of other Wikipedias at the same time. But this does not mean we must keep them. We need to be better than other Wikipedias, not bigger. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:56, 13 Iunii 2015 (UTC)

    • Hi, how are you? It's not a problem, I'll check these pages more carefully. This user adds a page a day isn't a big work. Ciao --Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 05:29, 14 Iunii 2015 (UTC)
OK, Masssimo, thanks for your reply. No problem then Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:27, 14 Iunii 2015 (UTC)

Same again[fontem recensere]

Same again, Massimo, I think: you have created pages for the communes of Mayotte but you have put them in the category for Martinique. See for example Dzaoudzi -- I believe they are all the same. Bad luck. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:11, 20 Iunii 2015 (UTC)

118,000[fontem recensere]

You've done it again, Massimo. Tell me, when all the French communes are completed, whatever will you do next?

The sun is shining here and our tomatoes will soon begin to ripen. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:05, 23 Iunii 2015 (UTC)

Pietralata[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, come stai? Fa caldo da morire anche da te?

Per favore, mi metteresti in buona forma questa pagina? Il mio latino non è poi così forte.... grazie mille per il prezioso aiuto!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 10:05, 29 Iunii 2015 (UTC)

Grazie milleeeeeee. Quindi, se non hai corretto nulla.... immagino che vada tutto bene e che la mia Latinistas cominci ad andare bene?
Grazie e a presto Rei Momo (disputatio) 07:17, 30 Iunii 2015 (UTC)
Grazie di tutto e buona giornata!!! Rei Momo (disputatio) 07:26, 1 Iulii 2015 (UTC)

CUM?[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. What does the expression CUM mean at Cytharista parrochia? It doesn't seem to make sense in Latin. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:43, 6 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I took it out. I think it had been copied from the French list of communes to our Latin list. Maybe it meant something on the French page originally! but clearly we needed to delete it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:54, 6 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
So I cleaned the whole list. It's no use writing things we don't understand!
Have a nice day, Massimo. It's hot here, but the tomatoes are doing well. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:07, 6 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

120,000[fontem recensere]

Well done! I knew we'd get there with your help ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:43, 10 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

Injection/Syringe[fontem recensere]

Macte de Radiotherapia. Autum, scias verbo pro Angclicis Injection, Syringe et Hypodermic needle? Gratias.Conatus conor inveni. (iI have tried and am trying to find.)--Jondel (disputatio) 07:08, 23 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

Ecclesia cathedralis Nostrae Dominae Immaculatae Conceptionis[fontem recensere]

Tibi magna gratias ago causa adiuti istae novae pagine!!! Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:32, 9 Octobris 2015 (UTC)

Charles de Lignières, (Caroli o Carolus de Lignieres)[fontem recensere]

Hello Helveticus montanus any interest for this neolatin poet: [2] ? (Possible translation)

Charles de Lignières, (vel interdum Caroli Carolus Lignieres) sit dominus Caudry in MDCLXXII, ipse successit Félix-Ignace-Guillaume Taffin antecedentibus Charles Viefville. Occupatisque munus Professor Collège du-Sorbonne. est auctor / poetae Latini aliquot libros modernis etiam Christianorum tragoediarum versibus exornavit. Comparative ad alios saeculo vicesimo primo studio ingenia analysi Martyr tragoediis Petri Corneille Polyeucte cumprimis hoc saeculo decimo septimo. --DDupard (disputatio) 12:40, 11 Octobris 2015 (UTC)

Commentatio de Aloisio Vincentio Berrnetti[fontem recensere]

Quid accidit, Helvetice, in categoriis commentationis de Aloisio Vincentio Bernetti? Error quidam rubre apparuit. Puto autem me illi obviare non valere. MARCVS (disputatio) 23:24, 11 Octobris 2015 (UTC)

Siiiii, Palermo e Bologna !!![fontem recensere]

Ciao carissimo, tutto bene? Sì, Bologna e Palermo, e sono due preti dei nostri! Un abbraccio!!! Rei Momo (disputatio) 19:04, 27 Octobris 2015 (UTC)

Perchè non mi appaiono i dati nell'infobox a sinistra? Rei Momo (disputatio) 19:16, 27 Octobris 2015 (UTC)

Projected "supplementum" space[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. I notice you haven't yet commented on this question. If you have any comment to make at Disputatio Vicipaediae:Spatium supplementorum -- positive or negative -- I'm sure it would be useful. Best wishes Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:44, 25 Novembris 2015 (UTC)

Ein Gruss aus dem Lande[fontem recensere]

Guten Tag Helveticus montanus. Was man auf den Seiten in lateinischer Sprache alles finden kann, ist schon beeindruckend. Wenn eine Bemerkung dem Neuling der mit seinen bescheidenen Mitteln dem Ganzen dienen will denn zusteht, stellt die gerade laufende Suche nach einer neuen Arbeitsweise in einem so prekären Vorhaben doch ein schönes Zeichen des breiten Engagements dar. Für meinen Teil bin ich zufrieden, einen so erfahrenen und wortwörtlich ausgezeichneten Verfasser in der Nähe zu wissen. Helvetisch grüsst von wie anzunehmen ist ennet den Bergen (Vanosilo (disputatio) 13:25, 26 Novembris 2015 (UTC))

Guten Tag Helveticus montanus. Zum neuen Jahr sende ich meine besten Wünsche in den Süden. (Vanosilo (disputatio) 13:31, 1 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC))

De histrionibus[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. I wonder if you noticed the list of actors (mostly I think cinema actors) added by an anonymous editor to Actor. As Neander points out on the talk page, these partly duplicate the five lists you have created at "Index histrionum ... actricum ...". Also the forenames have not been translated into Latin.

I think myself the best thing will be to make sure the names in this new list are present in your existing lists, and then to delete the new list, replacing it with links to your existing lists. Do you agree? Would you care to work on this, or are you too busy?

I hope you have a very good Christmas, Massimo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:24, 23 Decembris 2015 (UTC)

Latina[fontem recensere]

Why contribute to latine wikipedia ? Who will read it ??

De iubilaeo Vicipaedianorum

Annum 2016 prosperum et felicem omnibus amicis Vicipaedianis opto! Apud Tabernam consentivimus annum 2016 (quem iubilaeum nostrum Helveticus nuncupavit) praecipue dedicare ad textum paginarum Vicipaedicarum augendum et meliorandum. Huic proposito consentiens (si tu consentis!) sic pro communi inceptu nostro agere potes:

  • Quando paginas novas legibiles, fontibus munitas, et non brevissimas creare vis, crea! Ne timeas!
  • Quandocumque paginam aut breviorem aut mendosam aut male confectam reperis, cura! corrige! auge!
  • Si paginam novam brevissimam creare in mentem habes, recogita ... An potius textum longiorem scribere oportet? An prius aliam paginam, iam exstantem, augere potes?

Quo dicto, Vicipaediani liberi sumus. Paginae etiam breves, quae inter veras "stipulas" admitti possunt (vide formulam "Non stipula"), accepturae sunt sicut iam antea accipi solent. Scribe igitur sine metu, sicut iam scripsisti! [en] Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:35, 1 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

Michael Delpech[fontem recensere]

Buon giorno Helvetico Montano! Dans l'article Michael Delpech, j'ai vu que la ville de "Courbevoie" etait traduite par Curbavia - par contre, la ville de "Puteaux" est restée Puteaux, comme en français. Ne serait-ce pas "Puteoli" en Latin? -- (Dominik / Talk page) --Dominik (disputatio) 09:23, 4 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

Ciao Helveticus montanus! Merci pour l'explication. (Dominik / Talk page) --Dominik (disputatio) 15:24, 4 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

Gunnel Vallquist[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. You might like to look back at this page: UVbot checked one link, I checked the other, both are broken, and there is currently no source. Can you maybe add a source? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:04, 31 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

It's OK, don't worry, I found some sources via the Swedish page :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:22, 31 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

Nadina Sierra[fontem recensere]

Ciao Max, come stai? Tutto bene lì da te?

Per favore, mi daresti una piccola rilettura a questa pagina che ho appena creata? Grazie mille per il tuo prezioso aiuto!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:27, 15 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

Flexor digiti minimi brevis[fontem recensere]

Salve Helvetico montano ! Me adiuves si tibi placeat augere iste rem? --Jondel (disputatio) 01:07, 23 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)

De paginis brevissimis[fontem recensere]

Hi, Massimo. Hope you're OK. I wanted to mention -- as I did to Nuada as well -- that a few of your recent pages risk deletion because they are too short to be stipulae. You will see some at Categoria:Augenda a mense Martii 2016. They need a bit more real text. Another sentence would do it, I should think. I often add text to your new pages, but maybe you have a moment to do some too? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:48, 10 Iunii 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[fontem recensere]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[fontem recensere]

(Sorry to write in English)

Christmas greetings[fontem recensere]

I hope you're well, Massimo, and I wish you a very happy Christmas! Best wishes for 2018

Andrew -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:12, 21 Decembris 2017 (UTC)

Brasiliopolis[fontem recensere]

Ciao, caro, come stai?

Un piccolo favore: potresti rileggere l'aggiunta che ho inserito in questa pagina e vedere se è scritta correttamente? Io credo di no, sai, il mio Latino è molto maccheronico. Mi daresti una mano?

Grazie mille di tutto

Rei Momo (disputatio) 06:42, 22 Maii 2018 (UTC)

Buona Pasqua[fontem recensere]

Tanti auguri a te a a tutti i tuoi cari! Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:25, 21 Decembris 2018 (UTC)