Jump to content

Disputatio Usoris:UV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

Vide etiam disputationes annorum 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 et 2023.

On Reference Tooltips vs Previews[fontem recensere]

Hi, UV. I made a holding comment at meta:Talk:WMDE Technical Wishes/ReferencePreviews#Reference Previews to become the default for previewing references on more wikis. It is a bit early to claim we have a consensus, so I said that we might yet comment further. If you wished to add any remarks of your own I would be very happy. I notice that a similar comment has been made from ru:wiki (a much bigger wiki than ours)! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:23, 5 Februarii 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that at Phabricator we are already listed as not wanting to change, so this seems fine. We could always change later if Tooltips crumbles. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:34, 5 Februarii 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thank you! --UV (disputatio) 22:57, 6 Februarii 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article created by LTA[fontem recensere]

Hi, sorry for writting in english. Please delete Santadas Kathiababa. I requested deletion (although an IP keeps removing it) because the article was created by a LTA, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Srabanta_Deb. Also my guess is they used machine translation to create this article. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (disputatio) 15:18, 12 Martii 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continues at Disputatio:Santadas Kathiababa#Delenda?. --UV (disputatio) 21:47, 12 Martii 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, UV (Uwe?), Du hast bereits vor 9 Jahren vorgeschlagen, Theses de Feuerbach mit Thesen über Feuerbach zu vereinigen. Ich würde das stark befürworten und, weil Du Admin bist, dich direkt darum bitten. Es scheinen ja nicht einmal die wenigen Autoren Einspruch eingelegt zu haben. Wenn ich mir Categoria:Carolus Marx ansehe, scheint die Vereinigung unter dem deutschsprachigen Lemma die bessere Wahl zu sein, andererseits scheint mir der Text unter dem lateinischen Lemma der qualitativ bessere zu sein, wenn ich das mit meinen bescheidenen Kenntnissen richtig einschätze. Allerdings fehlen dort Inhalte aus dem anderen Text. Darauf gestoßen bin ich übrigens, weil mir in Wikidata eine Merkwürdigkeit auffiel, vergleiche meine Anfrage im deutschen Wikidata-Forum. — Speravir22:34, 6 Aprilis 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for interrupting, UV; forgive me, @Speravir:, for not understanding German very well. It seems to me that the pages were duplicated in error, and it's very surprising that they have lasted side by side for so long. They should be merged, surely. The pagename to choose, by our rules, is the original German title, unless the Latin translation of the title can be found elsewhere, already published in a reliable source. After the merger, a redirect in the other language (e.g. Latin) will remain. If this needs discussion, Disputatio:Theses de Feuerbach would be a good place. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:19, 7 Aprilis 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrew Dalby: It’s UV’s talk page, but from my side: You’re welcome and thank you for your information. — Speravir00:46, 8 Aprilis 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I currently lack the time for much Wikipedia work. It is not necessary to be an admin to merge pages: any user can merge the content from the Theses de Feuerbach to the Thesen über Feuerbach page and write merging content from Theses de Feuerbach, see the history page there for attribution to authors in the "Summarium:" field. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 20:53, 13 Aprilis 2024 (UTC)[reply]