Jump to content

Disputatio Usoris:Aylin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

Salve, Amphitrite!

Grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

Libenter me pete quaestiones ullas. Gratus apud nos!--Ioshus Rocchio 12:41, 15 Iulii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nota de salutando[fontem recensere]

If you look at Disputatio Formulae:Salve, you will see two new parameters we added to this template (I think we added them after I greeted you =]). You can now put {{salve|Nomen usoris in casu vocativo|m/f if you know the person's gender}} (I have gone back and added the vocative of your name, but I don't know your gender, so I left it blank). If m, it reads gratus acciperis, if f it reads grata, and if left blank it reads gratus aut grata. Nifty, huh? =].--Ioshus (disp) 20:31, 11 Septembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Γειά Σου![fontem recensere]

Noumenon sum et tibi salutem dico!

Hello, thank you for the nice comment on my profil. I hope that I can help the Latin-Wikipedia. And sorry that I write in English. My latin isn't very good - I'm just 14 years old. Could I write in german with you? That is easier for me. Best regards alkab Edit: Vielleicht könntest du mich in einem Chat adden, damit ich hier in der Lateinischen Wikipedia auch mal komplett durchblicke.Alkab

Salutatio[fontem recensere]

Salva sis, salutationes multae ex Hassia pulchra. Habito prope Francofurtum ad Moenum. Quattuordecim annos nata es et scribis in Vicipaedia. Optime! Astýanax

Hi! :-) --Rolandus 14:04, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... war schon sehr dramatisch ;-) --Rolandus 14:09, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ich schätze, jetzt fehlen noch ca. 900 Seiten ... --Rolandus 14:15, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Appetit! --Rolandus 14:20, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numeri Romani[fontem recensere]

Hi. Roland and I are working on something regarding roman numerals. For the meantime, culd you leave out the line MC=1100 from your new year pages? Consider using {{deanno}}, instead.--Ioshus (disp) 15:16, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, I know =[... It's ok, we are working on a program to do it for us.--Ioshus (disp) 15:33, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Sorry, this talk took very long. Let me first say thank you for your work and your patience. Here's what we have come up with. From now on, add the Roman numeral to the second call of the decennium. For instance, the year 211 shall be {{decennium|21|CCXI}}. Soon (within a few hours) the template will be fixed to include the information of {{deanno}}, which will become obsolete. You will not need to include a parameter to link to the (numerus) page, as the decennium template will be fixed to include [[{{{PAGENAME}}} (numerus)]] which will either be the numerus page, or redirect to the long-form name. Ie [[210 (numerus)]] may rdirect to [[Ducenti et unecim]]. There is no urgency to go back and readjust the templates that you have just made, but feel free to change the call on any number page you see. This will help us to be consistent throughout. Again, thanks for your patience and labor!--Ioshus (disp) 17:01, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe UV schon um die Änderung gebeten, siehe Disputatio Usoris:UV. --Rolandus 17:14, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hint: If you do not provide a summary when creating a page (e. g. "nova res") the system automatically creates a summary. Spart auch wieder ein paar Sekunden. ;-) --Rolandus 17:59, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Auch ein Argument ... ;-) --Rolandus 01:24, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Work in progress ... ;-) --Rolandus 09:38, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I leave you alone for 8 hours...[fontem recensere]

And there are 1000 more pages at Vicipaedia!!! Thnks for your hard work!!--Ioshus (disp) 13:42, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too for all that wonderful work. I am already adding births, deaths and events to the new pages. What fun! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:14, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ich warte ...[fontem recensere]

;-) --Rolandus 14:58, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, dann weiter ... --Rolandus 15:01, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ich glaub, ich hoer' jetzt auf ... ;-) --Rolandus 15:20, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ich denke, die 10.000 sind jetzt nur mehr ein Formalakt. ;-) --Rolandus 15:22, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das war eine ordentlich Performance in den letzten Tagen! --Rolandus 15:25, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How far back?[fontem recensere]

How far back will you create year pages? Maybe 753 a.C.n. (Roma condita)? --Rolandus 18:07, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that's far enough. ;-) --Rolandus 18:16, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you[fontem recensere]

for your hard work. --Massimo Macconi 18:25, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to thank you as well. --Rolandus 23:05, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just incredible what you and Rolandus have done! Thanks a lot for all the work and effort you invested! Da bin ich mal eine Woche lang nicht da und wenn ich zurückkomme, erkenne ich die Vicipaedia kaum wieder ;-) --UV 02:39, 2 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decennium[fontem recensere]

Yes, that's a bug, I have introduced, see the list of bugs on page Formula:Decennium. This template works for years and decennia. I think it needs some extra "#if". Don't care about this bug. It will be fixed. ;-) --Rolandus 20:34, 30 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought I have added this "685–695" myself and removed it. Please make a clenaup, if you can. ;-) (they are confusing me) --Rolandus 21:12, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your way is better than mine. :-) --Rolandus 21:21, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Provincia Caesaragausta[fontem recensere]

Ich war auch zuerst verbluefft ... ;-) --Rolandus 22:25, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputatio Usoris:[fontem recensere]

Hic usor iam est: Usor:Bohmhammel --Alex1011 17:41, 5 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amphitrite,

I see you put "70 000" for "DXX mille" in Baeterrae : could you tell me if there is a convention about using arabic numerals in this Wikipedia ? If so, of course I will use arabic numerals in the future... (since it's easier !)Thanks ! --Bsm15 21:11, 5 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how to create redirects? What is it that one shall write in a page to redirect it to another? I would like to create a redirect from Georg Stiernhielm (original name) to the article Georgius Stiernhielmus (Latin name). If you want you could help me with that. Thanks. Skvattram 21:20, 15 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salve Amphitrite[fontem recensere]

Salve Amphitrite! Lingua latina bella est. I'm a beginner, but I'd like to learn more. Thank you for your welcome message. Julian Mendez 15:44, 28 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting for me, Amphitrite .. and I continue to use those hundreds of date articles you set up. Best wishes Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:01, 5 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the redirects to British kings. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:05, 18 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about the best method to do that ... and it seems we have different solutions at the moment. Maybe Iustinus has an opinion. The "names" section needs a revision anyway. You followed the discussion about the templates ...? --Rolandus 22:17, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gratulationes, Amphitrite! Proposita es praemio fasti vicipaediae! vide Vicipaedia:Praemia Vicipaedianis--Xaverius 20:22, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

usor:[fontem recensere]

Vielleicht hast Du recht ... hab's repariert. ;-) --Rolandus 21:26, 26 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I'm glad it's not going to cause any confusion. Yay! Agriope 17:12, 10 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus carentes[fontem recensere]

Have you noticed this: http://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputatio_Usoris:Andrew_Dalby#.7B.7Bnexus_carentes.7D.7D In case you find such pages ... --Rolandus 12:33, 11 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up the list - I have asked for it ;-) I have moved the page to Vicipaedia:Dump/20070328 and I have created Vicipaedia:Dump. --Rolandus 18:32, 6 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are allowedencouraged to do this. It is very helpful. Thanks! --Ioshus (disp) 20:00, 6 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitatio[fontem recensere]

Wolfram Amphitritae s. p . d. Gratias tibi ago, sed usor notus iam sum (Bohmhammel), quamvis adituum mutandorum ac cookies prohibitorum causa semper anonymus hic adesse debeo. 13:20, 9 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pinacotheca[fontem recensere]

Multas gratias ago ob ausum tuum in hoc officio! --Ioshus (disp) 19:43, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[fontem recensere]

Could you translate a short phrase for me from English into Latin?

"Ideas without which Reason (rationality) is not"

Obviously, we probably have something with "idea", "sine qua non", and "ratio-something", but I would like to know the proper declensions and word order and such, if you would be so kind to help me. Thank you Centrx 15:43, 15 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got help from Ioshus Rocchio. Sorry to bother you. Centrx 16:13, 15 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bang up job!! THANKS! --Ioshus (disp) 17:06, 16 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mehercle! Mihi Stellam Constantiae adiudicavisti! Amice, tibi gratias summas ago, quod me tot tantisque beneficiis ornaveris! Haudquaquam tali honore me dignor. IacobusAmor 12:43, 22 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meo animo haec pagina est tenenda et augescenda. Sententiam ad hoc scripsi in disputatione, et paginam protegi. In animo habeo paginam vespere scribere. Placetne?--Ioshus (disp) 16:35, 2 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

consentio... as long as it will look more like latin than "girl" ;-) --Amphitrite 20:08, 2 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Promise =] --Ioshus (disp) 21:16, 2 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias ob praemium! Felix sum!--Xaverius 08:35, 22 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

centering[fontem recensere]

Gratias tantissimas ago. =] --Ioshus (disp) 01:59, 2 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

petitio magistratus[fontem recensere]

Salve, Amphitrite. Nominata est ut in ordinem magistratuum eligaris. Profer, quaeso, ascitum vel negationem apud Vicipaedia:Petitio_magistratus. Ut valeas!--Ioshus (disp) 14:56, 2 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salve iterum, amica! Nuntium misi in Adam, ut cognoscat finem petitionis. Tibi gratulor! Te scio potestate optimo modo usuram esse.--Ioshus (disp) 15:25, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Adam has already changed your rights. Congratulations! --Rolandus 07:50, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

de figura paginae primae[fontem recensere]

Salve Amphitrite. A few of us were discussing the layout and content of our pagina prima, and some expressed desire to rehaul it. This might include color changes, content changes, layout changes, and who knows what else. Could you join the discussion at Disputatio:Pagina prima/Nova? Give us a list of things you want a main page to have, what you dont want a main page to have, and what specifically you might think to do differently with ours. We will then try to come up with a design that meets as many of these requests as possible, based on content from everyone. Thanks, and regards.--Ioshus (disp) 20:37, 3 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cursus electronicus[fontem recensere]

Hi Amphitrite, how are you? Could you send me an email? I'm trying to compile a mailing list inter magistratus. Cheers! --Ioshus (disp) 17:47, 13 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias tibi ago[fontem recensere]

Thank you for helping me. --Harrissimo 15:23, 7 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hope you dont mind...[fontem recensere]

...I deleted your edit to Usor:IP Quindicenne and moved it to Disputatio Usoris:IP Quindicenne. Cheers!

--Ioscius (disp) 13:51, 18 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh, thanks, it's already afternoon, but I'm still tired ;-) --Amphitrite 14:01, 18 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habs gelesen :-)! IP Quindicenne 19:04, 18 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying grey line[fontem recensere]

Thank you for fixing my formula :) --Harrissimo 20:34, 21 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem =) --Amphitrite 16:21, 22 Iulii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Salve! There is a delenda at Categoria:Species Platyhelminthes. Could you take care of it please? Harrissimo.
Done :-) --Amphitrite 16:09, 3 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Including categories in formulae[fontem recensere]

I saw you removed Categoria:Praefecturae Graeciae from the formula {{Nomi Graeciae}}. My guess is that you did this because pages categorized in this way are listed in the dump as if they were no_cat. Is that right?

Well, I checked with Rolande (we were discussing the similar formula {{Praefecturae Franciae}}) and he says there is a work-round: we can tell him, next time around, to exclude from no_cat any pages that have this formula. So, unless there's some other reason that I don't know, I'd like to put the category back into the formula -- it'll save unnecessary typing as I continue to create pages for the praefecturae! OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:16, 9 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I mainly removed the category from the formula, because all those pages were listed in the dump. But I will readd the category to the formula, though I personally like it, if I can see all categories of an article while editig it, especially if an article is categorized in more than one category, because then it's easier to check if a a category is missing or if one is superfluous (for example there were some articles of cities in Greece, which were in addition to Categoria:Urbes Graeciae also categorized in Categoria:Oppida Graeciae, because the latter category was included in the formula {{Urbs Graeciae}}).
Looking at the time, I should better add the category tonight, because if I do it now, I will miss my bus...--Amphitrite 12:15, 9 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think, on reflection, you are right. It is maybe better to be able to see all the categories when editing. And I can paste all this stuff in when I make a new page, so no extra typing really. OK, let's leave things the way they are. Don't revert. And I hope you caught the bus! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:45, 9 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was late, but the bus was even later ;-) --Amphitrite 23:22, 9 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People categories[fontem recensere]

Thanks for your note on my talk page, Amphitrite. I hope the exams go well! Yes, when you have time for it, it will be really good to have those categories of people by nationality. It means a lot of sorting out, but very worthwhile.

As you say, "And maybe we should decide first how to name the categories: Categoria:Germani or Categoria:Homines Germaniae." The second type (as we already have in Categoria:Homines Turciae) seems more clumsy, but maybe (I think) it is the best. Words like Turci and Germani have multiple meanings. They are OK for medieval history, where we may be talking about tribes and peoples, but less useful for categorizing modern people, where we want to say where they live, not what tribe they belong to!!

Perhaps others will comment on this. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:54, 14 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using the second type sounds reasonable to me, so I will start creating those categories in the next time (not today, after learning eight hours for my history exam I have just no concentration left to do anything useful...) --Amphitrite 21:09, 17 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frenchmen (and women)[fontem recensere]

I'm very glad to see you are recategorizing them! Keep in mind that if you come across any writers, like Carolus Baudelarius, you can put them in Scriptores Franciae rather than Homines Franciae. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:57, 13 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me, I somehow forgot about those other categories (I guess this indicates, that I should better continue to categorize tomorrow ;-)) --Amphitrite 21:13, 13 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But don't let me put you off! There are times when a job is best done in two steps. It may be quicker to put them all in Homines Franciae and then consider further. Up to you. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:23, 14 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to categorize the remaining articles at once and improve the categories of those which are already in Homines Franciae afterwards. --Amphitrite 18:39, 19 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

happy new year[fontem recensere]

Hi,Amphhitrite, how do you write: a happy new year in latin? Hendricus 20:24, 31 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think "I wish you a happy new year" would be something like "Felicem annum novum tibi exopto". --Amphitrite 15:37, 1 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amphitriti graecorum filiae Brulovos s.d.

Cur ab urbe condita et latinis numeris eventorum diem et annum non scribis ? Cur arabis numeris et Gregorii pontificis fastis utere ? Si classicam latinam linguam scribere conamur non oportet. Vale. Brulovos 21:10, 2 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Est mos noster. Non creamus vicipaediam Romanam, sed vicipaediam Latinam: lingua Latina utimur, sed de qualibet re commentationes scribimus. Vide etiam Vicipaedia:Numeri Romani et Vicipaedia:Auxilium pro editione (latine). Vale! --UV 23:13, 2 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Velisne ut omnia reperta moderna scientifica neglegamus?! Minime profecto!--Rafaelgarcia 04:03, 3 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![fontem recensere]

Glad to see you back! --UV 21:29, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, hallo! :-) --Rolandus 21:34, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the welcome :-). I'm sorry for having been absent such a long time, but I was really busy with studying for a lot of exams. . . (still have to write one tomorrow, but it's at least the last one for the next two weeks). --Amphitrite 21:53, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that last one goes really well -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:54, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I hope so too ;-) --Amphitrite 22:00, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ben tornata :-) , welcome--Massimo Macconi 22:11, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to feel left out! We've missed you ;] --Ioscius (disp) 22:12, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias ago, Amphitrite!--Xaverius 19:42, 18 Maii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Deine Unterstützung heute abend, zu zweit geht vieles schneller! --UV 22:54, 14 Octobris 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem und dir auch vielen Dank! Damit geht es ja auch wirklich fix; die Türkei bekommt von mir heute abend noch eine Infobox, damit es einheitlicher wird... jetzt geh' ich aber erstmal schlafen ;). --Amphitrite 23:02, 14 Octobris 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias ago tibi, Amphitrite, quod errorem meum in Disputatione:Iansenismus commissum delevisti. --Fabullus 07:19, 7 Novembris 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libenter adiuvi. --Amphitrite 16:46, 7 Novembris 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homines vivi[fontem recensere]

Homines vivi = 'Living'. Admiror! Gratias! ;) IacobusAmor 13:54, 25 Iunii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

block on user anonymous[fontem recensere]

Hi Amphitrite. I extended the block period on that guy since it's the second case of this in as many days. You think a week was too extreme? Sorry, I confess I didn't see your block or I wouldn't have done one myself. Best, --Ioscius 07:00, 23 Martii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me – looking at his contributions I don't think that's too long. Since it was 4:30 am and I was about to leave for work, I didn't think very long about the length of the block. If I had checked his contributions this morning, I would probably have blocked him for a longer time myself. --Aylin 15:37, 23 Martii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nexŭs, ūs[fontem recensere]

Salve amice ! Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum. Illico emendo. Tibi gratias ago. Kamulewa 21:02, 9 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Amphitrite,

ich habe mir die Seite jetzt nochmal genauer angeschaut und festgestellt, dass sie doch einige Abkürzungen enthielt, die in Index abbreviationum Latinarum nicht enthalten sind. Könntest Du sie bitte wieder herstellen? Das beste wäre wohl anschließend den Merge-Baustein draufzusetzen. Sorry für den Schnellschuß.--Chris1981 09:23, 14 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Schon erledigt! War ja auch mein Fehler, dass ich nur schnell drüber geschaut habe. --Aylin 09:31, 14 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So ich habe jetzt alles, was noch nicht in Index abbreviationum Latinarum enthalten war, dorthin übertragen und Comprehensio wieder gelöscht. --Aylin 19:09, 14 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apem industriae (Theodisce Fleißbienchen) ob hanc rem bene meruisti.--Chris1981 18:59, 15 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gratias tibi ago! Obwohl es eigentlich Fleiß an der falschen Stelle war: Schließlich habe ich mich dem Artikelzusammenlegen nur gewidmet, weil ich keinen Nerv mehr hatte, weiter für meine Histologieprüfung zu lernen... ;) --Aylin 21:56, 15 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Der Kult-Nekrophile Mark Benecke hat übrigens vor kurzem einen Artikel über Hämatomanie in der de geschrieben. Vielleicht kann er Dir ja noch ein paar Tipps geben. Verstehe sowieso nicht, wieso Ihr Ärzte nicht kapiert, dass der menschliche Körper zum von außen anschauen da ist. Ut iam Seneca recte dixit: quomodo fabula sic vita: non quam diu, sed quam bene acta sit, refert. --Chris1981 06:19, 16 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nun, dem Seneca-Zitat stimme ich auf jeden Fall zu.--Aylin 10:02, 16 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so glad you got in ahead of me with the Usor:Labant subpages! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:44, 9 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem — those were quite a lot of pages! --Aylin 13:57, 9 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salve and nice to find all of you here. I decided to practice my Latin and begun by describing the video game Loom. Since I don't know anyone here, I randomly picked your name, since I'd like someone better than me check and make corrections to my article. Gratias ago! Lusor 08:02, 11 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thanks for your article! I will take a look at it, but the best place to ask for help and corrections is our Vicipaedia:Taberna, because there are many people whose latin is better than mine ;). --Aylin 12:11, 11 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Adam Episcopus 08:18, 12 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that I'd like to usurp fr:User:Aylin --Aylin 17:42, 12 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Popo le Chien 17:10, 17 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Aylin 17:25, 17 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Azwiki Done! --Sortilegus 16:47, 20 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that I'd like to usurp sq:User:Aylin. --Aylin 17:25, 17 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it.wiki username Aylin is now available for your SUL account. Ciao, Ary29 21:05, 24 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I made some confusion with another user. Aylin is not available yet, because according to it.wiki rules we must wait until 16:26, 27 May 2011 (CEST) for usurpation. Please bear with us for another day. Ciao, Ary29 19:04, 26 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now it.wiki username Aylin is finally available for your SUL account. Sorry for the wait. Ciao, Ary29 18:12, 31 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sq:User:Aylin is now available for usurp. Regards. --Eagleal 00:49, 13 Iunii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation at pt.wiki[fontem recensere]

I have renamed the user Aylin, so the name is currently free. Please log in to pt.wiki to register that name there. GoEThe 18:17, 30 Maii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation at ro.wp[fontem recensere]

The usurpation has been done. You may login and access ro.wp in order to create a local account linked to the global one.Andrei Stroe 14:48, 2 Iunii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation on ar.wp[fontem recensere]

I have renamed the requested user, you can now unify your account. --Shipmaster 21:35, 12 Iunii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad ...[fontem recensere]

... that it's you doing the Formula:Taxonomy conversion and not me. (Apart from the fact that I wouldn't really have known where to start!) It looks like a very long job ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:36, 4 Septembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And for extra fun, we now have {{Formula:Infobox dam}}, as seen in Moles Lijiaxiensis and other articles, and {{Formula:Infobox River}}, as seen in Flumen Flavum and other articles! IacobusAmor 14:07, 4 Septembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I knew I had to create a lot of templates, but in the end it were much more than I had expected! Formula:Automatic taxobox and formula:Ichnobox should work now, but I'm only going to create those of the formula:taxonomy/taxon formulae that we actually need at the moment...
As for [[Formula:infobox dam]] and [[Formula:infobox river]], I could create them if I knew the latin translation of all parameters ;) --Aylin 22:00, 4 Septembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be away a bit[fontem recensere]

How are you, Aylin? I thought I'd mention (because you and I and UV are among those who sometimes deal with housekeeping things) that I won't be watching "Nuper mutata" so much during November and December. I'm busier than usual. But I'll be back! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:01, 2 Novembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the nuper mutata – I usually try to take a look at them at least once a day. --Aylin 15:04, 4 Novembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formula Insulae Graeciae[fontem recensere]

Hllo Aylin, du hast mir schon einmal bei einer Infobox geholfen, vielleicht kannst du auch dieses Mal (es eilt nicht!) das Problem lösen. Ich habe die Infobox Formula:Insulae Graeciae erstellt, wenn ich sie aber auf die Insel Cos anwende, funktioniert sie nicht. Was habe ich diesmal falsch gemacht? Vielleicht hast du gelegentlich Zeit, einen Blick darauf zu werfen. Mit den Daten schaut es folgendermaßen aus: {{Insulae Graeciae |Nomen = Cos |Nomen_vulgare = Κῶς / Κως | lat_deg = 36 | lat_min = 49 | lon_deg = 27 | lon_min = 7 | position = right) |Positura maritima = Aegaeum mare |Archipelagus = Sporades |Area = 287.19 |Altitudo maxima = 846.00 |Civitas = Graecia |Regio = Aegaeum Australe |Demi = Cos |Locus medius = Cos |Numerus incolarum = 30 828 (2010) |Spissitudo = |postscripta = Insulae Graeciae |tabula = [[Imago: 2011 Dimos Ko.png|300px| Situs insulae Coi in Aegaeo mari australi }}--Utilo 14:02, 9 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Utilo, das primäre Problem liegt, glaube ich, hier: statt
[[Imago: 2011 Dimos Ko.png|300px| Situs insulae Coi in [[Aegaeum mare|Aegaeo mari australi]]

muss es

[[Imago: 2011 Dimos Ko.png|300px| Situs insulae Coi in [[Aegaeum mare|Aegaeo mari australi]]]]

heißen - zwei schließende eckige Klammern für den Link auf Aegaeum mare und nochmal zwei schließende eckige Klammern für die Einbindung des Bildes 2011 Dimos Ko.png. Grüße, --UV 17:38, 9 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UV hat Recht, du hast bei der Infobox überhaupt nichts falsch gemacht, sondern nur bei deinem Beispiel zwei eckige Klammern vergessen. Damit man nicht mehr so leicht den Überblick über die Klammern verliert, habe ich deine Infobox ein wenig geändert, sodass bei dem Parameter "tabula" nur noch der Bildnamen angegeben werden muss und die Beschreibung der Karte dann unter "descriptio tabulae" folgt. Aber falls dir das nicht gefallen sollte, kannst du es gerne wieder rückgängig machen – deine Lösung funktioniert nämlich auch! --Aylin 21:12, 11 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank euch beiden! Ich mache anderen nicht gern unnötige Arbeit, aber in technischen Dingen habe ich zu wenig Wissen und Übung!--Utilo 21:48, 11 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kein Problem! --Aylin 14:47, 14 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formula:Bacteria-stipula‎[fontem recensere]

Woohoo! Gratias! If you get the chance, may we have a fungi-stipula? :) IacobusAmor 13:45, 16 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Here it is:Formula:Fungi-stipula! --Aylin 14:12, 16 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Macte! Gratias pro tua summa celeritate! IacobusAmor 14:16, 16 Decembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't seen it before. Beautiful! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:30, 8 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate children[fontem recensere]

I expect you've noticed, Aylin, that the "automatic taxoboxes" throw out large numbers of redlink categories (see Specialis:Categoriae desideratae) with names including "immediate children" and "immediate step-children". I have no idea, I admit, whether these are potentially useful :) If they are useful, do you think there is any automated way of creating them and tucking them away in a handy super-category? Or, if they are really not useful, is there any easy way of getting rid of them? I ask because I sometimes work through the list of "Categoriae desideratae", attempting to replace red categories with blue ones, and it gets difficult to see the wood for the trees ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:21, 8 Februarii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not absolutly sure (and don't have time to check this tonight) if the "immediate children" categories have any other purpose than to link to the subgroups of a taxon in the "taxonomy/taxon" formulae, as you can see in Formula:Taxonomy/Grallatoridae for example - I don't know if this justifies their existance ;).
(There seems to be the option to let the automatic taxobox automatically display the childtaxa in the articles via the parameter "display_children", but I don't think that the categories are needed for this.)
I could try to find out which of our countless automatic taxobox templates is responsible for creating those categories and remove the relevant code (hopefully without breaking anything) or we could create the "immediate children" categories as subcategories of Categoria:Taxobox templates (or something like Categoria:Formulae taxonomicae).
Maybe a bot could do this, but since we don't need many of those categories at the moment, even creating them manually should not take very long. --Aylin 21:53, 9 Februarii 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much, Aylin. It's not an urgent thing, so don't take time that you can't spare. Yes, maybe the simplest way will be just to create the categories: that will dispose of them neatly! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:31, 10 Februarii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lorem ego potest auxilium emendare hoc, gratias: Maria de León Bello y Delgado.-- 12:31, 18 Februarii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Aylin, du hast am 14. Juni 2010 eine Seite mit dem Titel "Stadium" gelöscht. Spricht etwas dagegen, wenn ich eine neue Seite mit diesem Titel schreibe? (Inhalt vgl. de:Stadion?--Utilo (disputatio) 21:57, 11 Martii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, dagegen spricht überhaupt nichts! Der gelöschte Artikel enthielt einzig den Satz "je mange du pain tout les jours". --Aylin 20:05, 12 Martii 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Der Satz scheint in der Tat wenig schützenswert! Vielleicht gelingen mir ein paar sinnvollere Infos!--Utilo (disputatio) 20:16, 12 Martii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book creator[fontem recensere]

Hi, Aylin. Did you see A.Mahoney's question at the Vicipaedia:Taberna#Book creator? I wonder if by any chance you would know if this is possible -- and, if so, how it could be done?? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:38, 10 Maii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at the taberna. --Aylin 16:53, 11 Maii 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi gratias pro auxilio meliorem vasa: Achamán, Magec. Vos can take a inviso Guayota et Guanchus. Tibi gratias ago.-- 08:50, 11 Novembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salve, commentarios de Guayota Guanchisque legi et partes rescripsi, sed incepta exsequi conabor cras. --Aylin (disputatio) 21:27, 12 Novembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tibi gratias ago pro subsidio tuo. Haec paulo extendi posset, brebe est: Magec.-- 17:30, 14 Novembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nodi lymphatici/ nodus lymphaticus[fontem recensere]

Vielen Dank, Aylin, für Ihre Hilfe und alles Gute für Ihr Studium. Vielleicht können wir im Lauf der Zeit der kargen Kategoríe Medizin etwas auf die Sprünge helfen. Viele Grüße aus Bayern Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 15:03, 18 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr gerne! Vom Ende des Studiums trennt mich nur noch das praktische Jahr, das Examen habe ich schon im Oktober geschrieben - sodass ich nun auch wieder mehr Zeit haben sollte, mich hier zu beteiligen. Die Kategorie Medizin ist wirklich noch ausbaufähig :) --Aylin (disputatio) 16:00, 18 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De iubilaeo Vicipaedianorum

Annum 2016 prosperum et felicem omnibus amicis Vicipaedianis opto! Apud Tabernam consentivimus annum 2016 (quem iubilaeum nostrum Helveticus nuncupavit) praecipue dedicare ad textum paginarum Vicipaedicarum augendum et meliorandum. Huic proposito consentiens (si tu consentis!) sic pro communi inceptu nostro agere potes:

  • Quando paginas novas legibiles, fontibus munitas, et non brevissimas creare vis, crea! Ne timeas!
  • Quandocumque paginam aut breviorem aut mendosam aut male confectam reperis, cura! corrige! auge!
  • Si paginam novam brevissimam creare in mentem habes, recogita ... An potius textum longiorem scribere oportet? An prius aliam paginam, iam exstantem, augere potes?

Quo dicto, Vicipaediani liberi sumus. Paginae etiam breves, quae inter veras "stipulas" admitti possunt (vide formulam "Non stipula"), accepturae sunt sicut iam antea accipi solent. Scribe igitur sine metu, sicut iam scripsisti! [en] Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:35, 1 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arab string vandal[fontem recensere]

You may find value in blocking special:contributions/, special:contributions/ and special:contributions/ This person is a persistent nuisance with their mindless vandalism. You will see that we have some global abuse filters tracking the edits. Billinghurst (disputatio) 09:53, 9 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias vobis ago, Aylin et Billinghurst. Hoc videns, ego denuo unum annum hos numeros obstruxi. Videbimus ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:04, 9 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, Aylin, it's really good to see you back at Vicipaedia. Hope you're well -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:15, 9 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking a handful of IP addresses won't do it. In the past ten months, the source indicated here has invaded numerous articles, including Abortus, Aegyptus, Anaesthesia, Anura, Aqua, Cairus, Charta, Chemia, Chirurgia, Civitates Foederatae Americae, Consilium securitatis, Culicidae, Dammam, David (rex), Diarium, Euglena, Faeces, Herba, Hyoscyamus niger, Ignis, Laboratorium, Linguae mundi, Lympha, Medicina, Medicina dentium, Manufollium, Muhafaza, Musca, Primum auxilium, Rectangulum, Salus, Silva, Sutura chirurgica, Systema periodicum, Therapia, Tramen, Ucraina, Valetudinarium, Vermis, Vesper, and Virus immunodeficientiae humanae, returning to several of them from time to time after the lapse of weeks or months. The insertions may not exactly be "mindless." They (and their target articles) frequently have a medical theme, patently having something to do with lab experiments, but it's unknown whether the insertions are personal memoranda or interpersonal messages. ¶ The unwanted edits have come from IP addresses including (if they've been transcribed correctly):

Most (or all?) of these addresses have been used on a single day only, sometimes in multiple articles on that day; for example, Charta and Laboratorium via on 26 November 2018. The longest temporal gap seems to have been between 26 August 2018 (Tramen) and 29 October 2018 (Sutura chirurgica). The peak of activity seems to have been May & June 2018. Some of the extraneous edits have been self-reverted within minutes, or even within one minute. ¶ It has often been thought that the best solution would be to block all IP addresses starting with the digits 37 and 41 and 197, but people in the know have said that such an action would be inadvisable or impossible. Maybe you or others will have ideas. More could be written privately. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:11, 9 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'll remember, Iacobe, that we discussed this a few months ago, as a result of which I mentioned this problem at Meta. Possibly my report helped, possibly not: anyway, we have, since then, been getting help on this from Billinghurst and colleagues. The range block advised above -- you'll have seen my response to it -- will target the great majority of those addresses, and we can do a similar thing with the others if they become active again. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 9 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool[fontem recensere]

Hello Friend,

Apologies as this message is not in your native language.

The WMF language team is reaching out to you based on your position as an admin in the Latin Wikipedia. In particular, we want to learn about your experience, the issues you encounter with articles created with Content translation.

We appreciate the great work you are doing in Latin Wikipedia to ensure standard and quality articles are not compromised. However, it is a big task to encounter content that is not standard daily, and a difficult decision to delete them because they fall below standard.

Our observations

We noticed that articles created with the Content Translation tool in your wiki are deleted more frequently than in other Wikipedias. We say this because, from our statistics, 5360 articles were added to Latin Wikipedia in 2020. Out of the above figure, only 68 of them were translated using the Content Translation tool. 17 of the articles added with Content translation were deleted. Therefore, the tool's low usage and the deletion rate signals a problem or deficiencies peculiar to your Wikipedia. The Content Translation tool can increase content creation in your Wikipedia and is an excellent way to efficiently introduce newcomers to adding content and expand on existing ones.

Our request

So, we want you to participate in a survey. The survey will give us insight into how we can improve the tool to get quality articles and reduce the number of deletion, hence making your work easier.

Please follow this link to the Survey:

Take the Survey
To know how the information collected from the survey will be used, please read the Privacy Statement.

If you are not comfortable with taking the survey, that is fine. You can still provide us with feedback in this thread or via email on the following questions:

  • What makes the articles created with content translation fall below standard in your Wikipedia?
  • What are the common mistakes that editors that use content translation make?
  • How do you think we can improve the  Content Translation tool that will help you with your work or make your task easier and reduce deletion of articles in Latin Wikipedia?

So please, feel free to give us feedback in any way that is most convenient for you.

Thank you so much, as we look forward to your response

UOzurumba (WMF) (talk) 11:38, 21 Iunii 2021 (UTC) On behalf of the WMF language team.[reply]

Reminder: Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool[fontem recensere]

Hello Friend!

The WMF Language team earlier reached out to you to participate in a survey to give us insight into improving the Content Translation tool to make your work as an admin easier. Towards improving the quality of content in your Wikipedia and avoiding the case of content deletion.

Again, we are reaching out to you as a reminder to Take the Survey as the survey will close on 9th July 2021 (23:59 UTC). The survey will only take you between 10 to 15 minutes. Please read the Privacy Statement to know how the information collected from the survey will be used.

If you already took the survey- thank you! You don't need to retake it.

Thank you, as we look forward to your response.

UOzurumba (WMF) 19:17, 6 Iulii 2021 (UTC) On behalf of the WMF Language team.[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[fontem recensere]


You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:17, 4 Ianuarii 2022 (UTC)

Inactivity policy[fontem recensere]

Hi, Aylin. I hope you're OK.

In accord with general Wikimedia security, we have to suspend admin rights for magistratus who have been inactive for a certain period: we have defined this period as 12 months. If you want to retain your admin rights without interruption, the simplest thing to do is to make an edit on Vicipaedia within one month from now (before 20 January 2023). If you don't do this, your admin tools will be suspended on that date.

You are always welcome to Vicipaedia, now and later. Your account remains active, and if after 20 January you want to take up your magistracy again, there's no formality: just ask (on my talk page for example) and your tools will be restored.

Have a happy holiday period and a good New Year! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:31, 20 Decembris 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew,
thanks for bringing this to my attention - has it already been a year since I made my last edit?! 2022 has been indeed a busy year for me so far. I'll certainly need to try to contribute to Vicipaedia more often - this project is still very dear to my heart.
Wishing you happy holidays, too! -Aylin (disputatio) 09:13, 21 Decembris 2022 (UTC)[reply]