Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Pagina prima/Scin tu" differant

← Differentia superior Differentia proxima →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Emendatio ex 21:29, 24 Septembris 2007

Old "Scin tu...?"

In the same way that we have a list of our former paginae mensium, I think we should have a list with our "scin tu...?"--Xaverius 22:30, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

test phase / Iunio 2007

...Matriti cibum 15 Maii clarum esse Socolatam cum encytis?

...coniuratos Vambam regem Hispaniae totondisse et in habitus monacalis vestivisse ne rexisset? --Xaverius 22:30, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...primum caelorum viatorem anno 1969 pervenisse ad Lunam?

...Consortionem Populorum (vulgo Commonwealth of Nations) heredem Imperii Britannici esse?

Iulio 2007

...Newtoni leges tres omnium motus regere?

...Harrium Potter et Philisophi Lapidem primum librum de Harrio Pottero esse?

...inter omnia holera portulaca, a multis cultoribus ut mala herba eruncata, maximam copiam acidorum omega-3 continere?

...Rodericum Campidoctorem, etiam el Cid appellatur, ob multas gestas suas heroem Hispanum esse?

...antiquissimam urbem Rutheniae Novogardiam esse, anno 859 conditam?

...tempore Imperii Romani saccharon pretiosissimum esse et in medicinam usurpatum?

Augusto 2007

...in ecclesiis Christianis occidentalibus Quadragesimam incipere die Cinerum?

...Iohannem Sebastianum Bach potuisse signum suum B-A-C-H in compositiones inscribere, ut, Germana orthographia, B♭ scribebatur B, et B♮ H?

...Eleutherium Benizelum (Graece Eleftherios Venizelos), primum ministrum Graeciae, ter interfectoribus superfuisse?

...Indos Tainos Cubanos nomen Huracan primos invenisse pro typhonibus marinis sinum Mexicanum versis qui Cubam magnopere omni anno afflictant?

Septembre 2007

...pediludium ludum Olympiarum Aestivarum primum anno 1920 in Antverpia fuisse?

...linguam Vasconicam non ex linguiis Indoeuropaeis ortam esse?

Octobre 2007

Novembre 2007

Decembre 2007

New "Scin tu...?" / Proposals

...Universitas Duquesnensis in Pittsburgo, Pennsilvania, primum institutum catholicum in Pennsilvania donari statum universititatis fuit? Alexander Pittsburgiensis 21:29, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~...1969 primum viatorem caelorum pervenisse ad Lunam? (--Xaverius 10:00, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))~~ [reply]

~~...primum caelorum viatorem anno 1969 pervenisse ad Lunam?--Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]~~
~~...primam urbem Rutheniae, Novogardiam condita anno 859 esse? (--Xaverius 10:00, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]~~
...primam urbem Rutheniae Novogardiam esse condita anno 859?--Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...antiquissimam urbem Rutheniae Novogardiam esse, anno 859 conditam?--Andrew Dalby 20:43, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~...in Religione Christiana, (--Xaverius 10:00, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]~~
...in religione Christiana diem Cinerum quadrigenta dies ieiuniorum incipere? --Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We might want to specify WHICH Christianity. --Iustinus 09:12, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it in all?--Xaverius 09:22, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite. Maybe:
~~...in ecclesiis Christianis occidentalibus Quadragesimam incipere die Cinerum? --Andrew Dalby 11:28, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]~~
~~...Newtoni leges tres rexisse motum et mechanicam? (--Xaverius 10:09, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]~~
..leges tres omnia motus rexisse? --Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
rexisse > regere. Omnia motus > omnes motus or omnium motus. --Iustinus 09:12, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it is regere! it is not in the past! the last time I checked, the three laws still aplied. At least here in Oxford... in Spain is different--Xaverius 09:22, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And in Mexico, you get the leyes de mota.... But seriously, I added a link to Newton...--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:23, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny how I didn't see this thread until just now! So then ...Newtoni leges tres omnium motus regere? -> Newton's three laws rule all of motion? --Rafaelgarcia 18:28, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but it's cleverly ambiguous, because motus is 4th declension, so it could be read as genitive after leges. --Ioshus ^(disp) 05:36, 21 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~...Harrium Potter et Philisophi Lapidem primum librum de Harrio Potter esse? (--Xaverius 10:09, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]~~
~~...Harrium Potter et Philisophi Lapidem primum librum de Harrio Pottero esse? --Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]~~
...Consortionem Populorum (vulgo Commonwealth of Nations) heredem Imperii Britannici esse? (--Xaverius 10:09, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]
...tempore Imperii Romani saccharum pretiosissimum esse et in medicinam usurpatum? (--Andrew Dalby 20:43, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]
...inter omnia holera portulaca, a multis cultoribus ut mala herba eruncata, maximam copiam acidorum omega-3 continere? (--Andrew Dalby 20:43, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC))[reply]

~~...Rodericum Campidoctorem, etiam el Cid appellatur, ob multas gestas suas heroem Hispanum esse? (--Xaverius 15:24, 18 Iunii 2007 (UTC))~~[reply]

...duas esse diei terrestris definitiones: solarem et sideralem?

...radicem spiritualem Iohanni Bach esse christianismum confessionis Lutheranae?

Not sure I understand that...--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:29, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I didn't do a good job of rendering it but I assume what was meant on the Bach page is : Bach's spiritual root was chrisiatinity of the Lutheran confession.<-Bachi radix spiritualis christianismus erat confessionis Lutheranae cui toto corde adhaerebat.--Rafaelgarcia 03:56, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha!, Well I don't quite understand what was on the Bach page, either. Maybe we can tweak this to include the sententia soli deo gloria?--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:14, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But on the same subject: ...Iohannes Bach potuisse signum suum B-A-C-H in compositiones inscribere, ut, Germana orthographia, B♭ scribebatur B, et B♮ H?--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:29, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC) [reply]

~~Actually yours sounds like a more interesting question than my suggested question.--Rafaelgarcia 03:56, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~Ha, again. =] Yes, I liked it... --Ioshus ^(disp) 04:14, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

Kieliam capitem Slesvici et Holsatiae esse? (--Xaverius 16:19, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC))[reply]

...sanctum et doctorem Ecclesiae Isidorum Hispalensem patronum scholasticorum Archaeologiae, Historiae, Geographiae et Philosophiae esse ob Etymologias?

~~...Eleutherium Benizelum (Graece Eleftherios Venizelos), primum ministrum Graeciae, ter interfectoribus superfuisse? Andrew Dalby 09:22, 29 Iulii 2007 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~...Indos Tainos Cubanos pro typhonibus marinis sinum Mexicanum versis qui Cubam magnopere omni anno afflictant nomen Huracan primos invenisse?--Rafaelgarcia 15:23, 17 Augusti 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

...xotam saltationem Hispanicam esse quae in Philippinis etiam invenientur?--Xaverius 11:40, 29 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~...pediludium ludum Olympiarum Aestivarum primum anno 1920 in Antverpia fuisse?--Xaverius 18:41, 3 Septembris 2007 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~...linguam Vasconicam non ex linguiis Indoeuropaeis ortam esse?--Xaverius 18:45, 3 Septembris 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

...iam aevo Antiquo Democritum Atomos invenire et a Isidoro depictae esse? --Xaverius 11:13, 9 Septembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...Gothos et Francos cum scramsaxiis pugnavisse et hunc gladium nomen dedisse Saxonis? --Xaverius 11:19, 9 Septembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nuntia

Maybe we can include some News items too...--Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

undas telephonorum gestabilium credi leti esse causam apibus multis in CFA et Europa?

The only problem I see with this, Rafael, is that we will need to cite our information. Would you have a references section on the main page? Or how else would you get around this?

--Ioshus ^(disp) 22:35, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Putting references on the front page might get to be a bit much... It would be best if one of the articles linked to in the question text provided the reference to an external news article originating the news datum. In this case the bee article can provide the necessary journalistic reference.--Rafaelgarcia 22:49, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So then, the only thing is, in practice, we will need to 1) scour the news for items on which we have a page; or 2) be prodigious in editing/citing articles about which we would like to have news items. I say "in practice" because in theory this is easy, but I hope that it will work out. The current shape of our nuntii/nuntia is not over encouraging to me.--Ioshus ^(disp) 23:19, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that has to be our rule: references cited on the page that is linked from the scintu or nuntium. At least if there can be any controversy. I don't feel the need to justify the statement that the Commonwealth succeeded the British Empire, nor that Bush went to Albania. He did go, didn't he? Andrew Dalby 09:05, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If its a current event I guess it isn't as important to give a citation unless the reference would happen to an external Latini Nuntii like Ephemerus--Rafaelgarcia 00:23, 14 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good point. Always useful to link to those if possible. Andrew Dalby 14:08, 14 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ratio

What is the purpose of this page:

Is it to feature interesting content from articles at Vicipaedia?
Is it to feature newly created articles, such as its counterparts at other language Wikipedias?

That being asked, who is going to be the head of this project? I'm guessing Xaverius? I think we have a Specialis:Newpages where we can go for new pages. Maybe this should happen on a weekly basis? Bi-weekly? m

If we are to include news items, maybe a sub header?

Thoughts?

--Ioshus ^(disp) 19:08, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking this section to hold interesting pages of our Vicipaedia, but of course, it is also sensible to include new pages created. However, I was intending these to be at least with latinitas +1, I wouldn't like to make a link from the front page to a maxcorrigenda. On the other hand, this would be a way of drawing atention to this pages so they may be improved (¿?).--Xaverius 21:21, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My thinking is that the reason is both 1 and 2 but primarily 1. Showing a question pertaining to a current event every once in a while would add an interesting dimension to the Vicipaedia project and serves to draw attention to our Nuntia page.

In terms of deciding what to show and how often:

Changing the questions once a month or twice a month would probably be manageable; given the smallness of the Vicipaedia our focus should primarily be on creating and revising pages not managing the Pagina Prima.
Decisions on which question to show can be made by nomination and voting like with the Paginae Mensis. Criteria should include the quality of the page and how interesting the content is.

My 2 cents.--Rafaelgarcia 23:04, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The main reason is 1, but a new page can also be worth being featured, so it is sometimes 2 as well. However, announcing new pages should be done in an extra section, because new pages can be poor sometimes. But we should have such a manually maintained list of new pages on our pagina prima. Maybe in the education section? --Rolandus 08:05, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether voting for each item in turn will become too complicated. Maybe we just vote for Xaverius, keep on adding ideas, and hope he'll be willing to look after it for a while ;-) Andrew Dalby 20:46, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would Xaverius be interested in taking on the responsibility for being the point man?--Rafaelgarcia 20:57, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be most glad to accept! I think that fortnight changes would work for the time being. However, I am a bit busy now with exams and my site report, which decreases my monthly average of contributions, although I will still be able to change this, let us say, every two sundays. I must say too that I will be excavating most of this summer in Toledo (strangely enough, the palace of the Visigothic kings) and Numancia, so I will have to hand this responsibility to someone else, or maybe share it while I am excavating.--Xaverius 21:07, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like fun. Thanks for volunteering to be our Scintu point man! I'm assuming no one will object.Rafaelgarcia 21:11, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Por fuerza, me voy a hacer un experto en las interrogativas directas con doble acusativo...--Xaverius 21:14, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jajaja, Javi. Todos que encontran el doble accusativo lo aman! Gracias por ser jefe de "¿Sabías que...?"!--Ioshus ^(disp) 21:35, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xaverius, I took the liberty of editing the Sintu formula to correct a couple of grammar errors that Neander found on the Vamba page and to mimick his edit of the ne clause on the page. I hope you don't mind. --Rafaelgarcia 04:11, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I do not mind, after all, that's what we are here for, aren't we? I have hust now changed the latinitas from non censa to +1--Xaverius 08:32, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

B-A-C-H (Augusto)

Quid significat B? ? Potestne hoc signum recte patefieri computatris omnibus prater meum? Difficilis res est translatu, nam neque (Anglice) B sharp neque B flat Romani noverant. Si res tamen ponatur in pagina prima, via est invenienda patefaciendi signa desiderata (crux duplex et b parvum)--91.34.187.83 14:47, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC) (Scripsi ego, agnoscite --Iovis Fulmen 15:02, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC))[reply]

"Potestne hoc signum recte patefieri computatris omnibus prater meum?" Sic, fortasse! Textum quem rescribi fuit: "Iohannem Sebastianum Bach potuisse signum suum B-A-C-H in compositiones inscribere, ut, Germana orthographia, B♭ scribebatur B, et B♮ H?" Ego ibi video "B [flat] scribebatur B, et B [natural] H"; tu, fortasse, aliam rem; alii quid vident? Andrew Dalby 16:12, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ita, video symbola solita tantum . . . --Ioscius ^(disp) 15:29, 17 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tunc vitium machinae meae est. Gratias ago vobis.--Iovis Fulmen 18:41, 21 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Linea 44: / Linea 44: @@
 ==New "Scin tu...?" / Proposals==
+...[[Universitas Spiritus Sancti Duquesnensis|Universitas Duquesnensis]] in [[Pittsburgum|Pittsburgo]], [[Pennsilvania]], primum institutum catholicum in Pennsilvania donari statum universititatis fuit? [[Usor:Alexander Pittsburgiensis|Alexander Pittsburgiensis]] 21:29, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
 <s>...[[1969]] primum viatorem caelorum pervenisse ad '''[[Luna (satelles)|Lunam]]'''? (--[[Usor:Xaverius|Xaverius]] 10:00, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC))
 ::...primum caelorum viatorem anno [[1969]] pervenisse ad '''[[Luna (satelles)|Lunam]]'''?--[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 19:02, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)