Disputatio:Sententia (gnome)

Shouldn't this page be moved to Gnome? --Roland2 10:07, 21 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or to wikibooks?--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:04, 24 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat that this should not be here, but at wikibooks.--Ioshus ^(disp) 12:07, 17 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Vicicitatio? But shouldn't we keep a list here? At least to be able to redirect the several pages about quotations to this list. And: I think we need a template analoguous to {{movenda ad victionarium}}. --Rolandus 12:15, 17 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the MEANING of each should be given, as should the SOURCE (when possible). And "Horace's third book of songs" is an inadequate reference. IacobusAmor 12:50, 17 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article remains nearly useless. The meaning & source of each gnome should be given. Quid significat "Veni, vidi, caepi"? et quis fuit hic Valerius Antonius Scutus? Google eum non novit! IacobusAmor 14:21, 19 Augusti 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one responded to this, I removed it. I found a few examples of "veni, vidi, cepi" in Google Books, but they seem to be mostly misquotes of Caesar. Lesgles (disputatio) 05:33, 2 Iunii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus mortuus

Sententiae Galliae--Chris1981 03:18, 5 Iunii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cato

There is this one in the article: "Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam". But shoudn't it be "Praeterea censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"? Or is Cato famous for both? I know that the second one is more typical, so I'll add it.

Donatello (disputatio) 00:37, 11 Martii 2013 (UTC).[reply]

De paginae consilio

Collator Mr.framm& locutionem exempli gratia addidit, quae non cum definitione supra scripta congruit, sed cum nexibus Vicidatorum (en:List of Latin phrases, fr:Liste de locutions Latines, de:Liste lateinischer Phrasen, etc.). Oportetne paginam ad Index locutionum Latinarum vel sim. movere, an oportet paginam sententiis vero moralibus definire? Quaestio autem de utilitate paginae supra posita non est soluta. Mea sententia, paginam conservare liceat si definitiones, fontes, aut nexus ad commentationes distinctas (e.g. Medice, cura te ipsum) in ea includamus. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:42, 20 Februarii 2015‎

"Lorem ipsum" quoque non est sententia moralis! :) Lesgles (disputatio) 12:30, 3 Februarii 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neque sententia moralis, neque Latine scriptum ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:36, 3 Februarii 2017 (UTC)[reply]

moralis?

Multae sententiae non sunt morales. --Alex1011 (disputatio) 20:18, 16 Iunii 2020 (UTC)[reply]