Disputatio:Ioannes Sebastianus Bachius

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

LATINITAS[fontem recensere]

  • +1 (inspecta1) --Marc mage 21:11, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)

De nomine[fontem recensere]

Videte s.v.p. Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 18#Categoria:Iohannes Sebastianus Bach. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:05, 24 Septembris 2012 (UTC)

Bach/Bachius[fontem recensere]

I recently moved the page to Bach, not seeing a source for Bachius, but I see Iacobus has now found one. I'm fine either way, and if someone wants to move it back, please do! Lesgles (disputatio) 18:04, 22 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

There was a long discussion of this name on the Taberna in 2012 (I have just updated the link above). No one at that time had thought of Bachius: the debate, inconclusive as so often, was between Ioannes and Iohannes, and I hesitate to revive it, but if further sources have turned up, we should keep that h? in mind. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:46, 22 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
Igitur, fontibus inventis, fiat denuo titulus lemmatis Bachius.--Viator (disputatio) 22:10, 23 Augusti 2015 (UTC)

viginti proles, quorum ...?[fontem recensere]

Proles (generis feminini) non solum liberi sunt, sed etiam tota progenies. Praeterea imprimis in poematis reperitur. Ergo simpliciore vocabulo liberi utor. --Bavarese (disputatio) 17:35, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)

Probe dicis, amice. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:36, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)
Salve! A te, amice, qui his paginis magnam ac diuturnam operam et dedisti et das, responsum spero: Estne nobis pagina omnia genera operum musicorum, systematice composita, continens? Talem rem utilem esse puto, ne rerum accumulatarum immensa moles vicipediana iterum atque iterum, et nonnumquam frustra, concutienda sit. --Bavarese (disputatio) 18:06, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)