Disputatio Usoris:Amahoney/Non annexae

Request[fontem recensere]

Before you run this program again (which would be a good thing to do, perhaps every month or so), is there a program that you could run to check whether articles that would be listed here are still, in fact, commentarii non annexi? I ask because occasionally a new article will provide the desired link but leave the callout standing. Perhaps you or UV has a program that would remove redundant callouts? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:13, 18 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, haven't thought about that. This program goes by the category (Categoria:Non Annexae), which in turn is populated by the formula. I think it is in principle possible to look at the "Nexus ad paginam" link from within a program. I'll see what I can do with it after I get the 10,000 Pages business under control. But I can certainly run this again now, in its present state, for what that's worth. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:46, 18 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe UV removes the formula if there are incoming links ... but I might be wrong. He'll answer, no doubt. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:53, 18 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The list is now up to date -- I'll try to remember to do this more frequently! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:55, 18 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo! I'm still the champion! All but a handful of my unlinked texts, however, treat plants & animals, and so their placement in the hierarchy of living things is firmly & openly established in the taxoboxes. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:00, 5 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, every time or at least every other time when a new dump is provided (new dumps currently are provided about twice a month), I remove the template from pages with incoming links. Today's dump resulted in the removal of the template from 16 pages. --UV (disputatio) 20:25, 18 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's great! Just now, I've linked a couple of items and have removed the non annexae callouts by hand. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:00, 5 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Progress! Every bit of cleanup helps..... A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:26, 5 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of updating the list soon? Since 7 November, I've made some connections by hand, and they won't be reflected in the printout until an update happens. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 23:09, 21 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it: thanks for the reminder -- I tend to forget this page even though I pay attention to various other lists of corrigenda. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 13:19, 22 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have the time, could we get another update? I fixed all of mine on the list, but I'm sure I've made more. :) Lesgles (disputatio) 16:48, 7 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- and there are about 70 more pages than there used to be :-( A. Mahoney (disputatio) 18:19, 7 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad, but thanks for the update! At least I am mostly not to blame this time. :) "Bonum autem facientes, non deficiamus; tempore enim suo metemus, non deficientes." Lesgles (disputatio) 02:59, 8 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)[reply]