Disputatio Categoriae:Dei ficti
Dei ficti[fontem recensere]
"Dei ficti"? Sunt tum Cthulhu aut Macaronoteras Volatile fictiores quam Iovis at Sivus? Fortasse nomen categoriae novum dandum est... Categoria:Dei in historiis fictionis?--Xaverius 09:40, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Praeterea, sunt qui nobis suadeant omnes deos esse fictos; ergo categoriam "Dei in historiis fictis" esse eandem categoriam ac "Dei"! :) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:48, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Recte, Iacobe! Sub arbore categoriarum nostrarum dei humanarum religionum "Res opinabiles" esse debent. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:24, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Ita! Sed de nomine huius categoriae, quae est de deis in litteris aut mythishoriis, nomen novum censeo esse creandum.--Xaverius 12:26, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Recte, Iacobe! Sub arbore categoriarum nostrarum dei humanarum religionum "Res opinabiles" esse debent. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:24, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
Sunt qui deos religionis credant. Dei ficti sunt eo consilio creati(ob iocum vel ut pars fabularum ). This category is for those 'gods' intentionaly created, as a parody or as a part of their fiction. This is opposed to gods whom people believed were real and have faith in and usually have an established religion.Jondel (disputatio) 13:15, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I don't think this title is seriously misleading -- we know what we mean, and it might be difficult to say it more clearly even with a lot more words. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:25, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. These are good topics for a debate, but this site really is for encyclopedic things (and in latin of course). There really are good forums for those debates , e.g check out facebook. You can do this in latin. Abeundum mihi est. Sorry for being a killjoy. Jondel (disputatio) 13:30, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Wow, easy everyone... I just wanted to underline that "dei ficti" means "fake gods", and that perhaps what we wanted is "gods in literature", "gods in fiction". Andrew noster mentioned that the name is not that misleading, so it was perhaps my impression on the title.--Xaverius 13:36, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Xaverius's point is well taken. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:54, 15 Ianuarii 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, easy everyone... I just wanted to underline that "dei ficti" means "fake gods", and that perhaps what we wanted is "gods in literature", "gods in fiction". Andrew noster mentioned that the name is not that misleading, so it was perhaps my impression on the title.--Xaverius 13:36, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. These are good topics for a debate, but this site really is for encyclopedic things (and in latin of course). There really are good forums for those debates , e.g check out facebook. You can do this in latin. Abeundum mihi est. Sorry for being a killjoy. Jondel (disputatio) 13:30, 25 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
I apologize. It seemed like 'Are Cthulhu or the Spaghetti monster more made up than Shiva or Jove.--Jondel (disputatio) 13:44, 26 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
- Is that a question that Vicipaedia can answer? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:54, 15 Ianuarii 2024 (UTC)