Disputatio Usoris:Rolandus

Vide etiam Disputatio Usoris:Rolandus/2005-12.

Ioannes and Ioannes (nomen)

What about moving the homines-section from the page Ioannes (nomen) to the discretiva page? We could write the translations of the name and all its variations on the ...(nomen) page and list all "homines" on the discretiva page. (oder sollte das eigentlich schon so gemacht werden, bei Iustinus (nomen) und Iustinus sieht das ja so aus?) ich geh jetzt erstmal schlafen, muss um 5 Uhr wieder aufstehen... --Amphitrite 21:52, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

I read this discussion some time ago and after reading it a second time today, I decided to stay away from all these name-pages, until someone else will find a solution ;-). But actually I like your proposal of having only one main page and all other pages being redirected to this page.

(for example we have at the moment

• Ioannes

with a link to Ioannes (nomen) and a link to Iohannes

with a list of "homines"

• Ioannes (nomen)

with a link to Ioannes

with translations of the name into other languages

with a list of "homines"

• Iohannes

with a list of "homines"

with a link to Ioannes

• Johann,a redirect to Iohannes
• Johannes, a redirect to Iohannes
• Sean, a redirect to Ioannes

and maybe one main page would make it less complicated)

--Amphitrite 18:32, 20 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

New formulas

I just wanted to say that I like the current designs. We sometimes go overboard with borders, flashing lights, etc. These two formulas (non latine and non stipula) look neat, practical and official! Andrew Dalby 13:06, 21 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Then take no notice of me -- just do what comes naturally! Andrew Dalby 19:59, 21 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

I like the wider margin. Andrew Dalby 19:55, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

usor:82.55.85.101

Vielleicht wollte er ja auch nur den Artikel loben ;-) -Amphitrite 21:22, 26 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!!!!

Thank you so much for what you wrote me. I suppose I was quite rude while saying what I said, and I forgot you have too many work to do here. Sorry!!! :'(. From now on, I'll use that template almost every time.--Le K-li 22:14, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Sorry!!!

Sorry!!! I didn't want to do anything wrong. Well, I guess I'd have to create that new template.--Le K-li 23:53, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Periodicum?

Cur "periodicum" in pagina de Kalendis Aprilibus? --Alex1011 14:39, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Please

could you check my Latin in Ernestus Kantorowicz, because I added a lot of things. Thank you--Massimo Macconi 20:18, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)

thank you very much

I asked you, because I saw that you were inserting the formulas about the level of Latin used in the pages. Ciao e grazie--Massimo Macconi 21:11, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)

conservapedia

Tuum exemplum mihi delendum esse videtur quia interea haec pagina in conservapedia elaborata est. Etiam in nostra vicipaedia nonnullae paginae sunt quae primum breviores sunt antequam amplius elaborabuntur. --Alex1011 19:47, 6 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Salve!

Any recommendations on what I should do? Shall I join again with another username? I could do that. Amphytrite 04:52, 8 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the resources list! It helped a lot. Hopefully this name won't create as much confusion! Agriope 00:10, 9 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Latinitas

I just noticed your -7s on some Russian towns. Actually I think the Latin in these articles was quite good (as good as my average, anyway). I adjusted the mark. OK? Andrew Dalby 21:28, 8 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I understand now! Fine. Andrew Dalby 11:03, 9 Martii 2007 (UTC)

My feeling about TUGS is that it just isn't Latin (although, by random chance, some of the individual words are Latin!) So I put {{Non latine}} in place of Latinitas: maxcorrigenda. Revert me if you disagree. Andrew Dalby 14:09, 12 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Latinitas:pessima! I have added it to TUGS now. Andrew Dalby 12:35, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Nexus carentes

Hab' ich schon gesehen, aber da ich nur in der deutschen Wikipedia suche, weiß ich auch nicht, ob es wirklich keine Interwikilinks gibt ;-) Aber ich denke, dass vor allem viele unserer Namensartikel in eine solche Kategorie fallen würden...--Amphitrite 12:47, 11 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Nice selection of pics on physica electromagnetica

Dear Rolandus, thanks for the nice pics you posted on "Physica electromagnetica" and also about the advice on logging in which I will try out.Rafaelgarcia 00:52, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)

If I close firefox, then reopen it and then go to my usor page, it indicates I'm logged in but I am not, even if I previously cliked "Tesseram meam inter conventa memento". If then I click on "Conventum concludere" and then "Conventum aperire" I have to reenter the first letter of my name, it autofills the rest and fills in my password, and then I'm actually logged in to Vicipaedia. Rather unnecessarily involved!Rafaelgarcia 03:09, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Formula:Comitatus Angliae

Quod problemam habes de hac formula? --Alex1011 10:01, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)

Zacynthus

I deleted a discretiva page you made a while back. I hope you don't mind. In reality Zacynthus the place in Ionia and Zacynthus the Ionian island are the same, and I don't think they will ever want two separate articles -- but if you disagree I'll bring it back!

Incidentally, I notice you are bringing to light lots of Dubcats and Nexus carentes right now. Very necessary work. Andrew Dalby 21:47, 1 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Rursus salve!

Okay, this is probably going to sound weird, so I'll explain first. I'm taking an Advanced Grammar and Comp course, and our final exam is to write a Vikipædia article and put it on here. In part I wanted to warn you that twelve really random articles about things like tennis and biology are going to (or should, anyway) pop up fully written around the beginning of May. Here's what I'm wondering: do you guys mind this? Would you rather the articles start small and grow slowly (I imagine that would be easier for grammar)? We don't really have a choice in this matter, but I'd like to know when I make new articles in the future. Thanks! Agriope 03:47, 12 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

We only mind if you call it Vikipædia again... (noli uti k aut ligaturis). Other than that, we don't mind at all. Although, tenniludium and Biologia are already started... But I mean, as far as random goes... check out hangman, Magic 8 Ball, pesto, paper air plane, and Flying Spaghetti Monster. Randomness should not be your concern, but good Latin. Start with what you can manage in terms of size. Bear in mind, if you write a huge article, it might be harder to get someone to make corrections. I assure, for my part, that I will assist in any way you all need. Good luck!--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:10, 12 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Shoot, I almost forgot to add beer pong to the list of random articles =] --Ioshus ^(disp) 04:15, 12 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Of course, good Latin is always my first and foremost concern, whether I want it to be or not. They're writing on specific parts of biology and tennis as far as I know. I'm writing on a band called Say Anything--when I create the article, should I put the name in Latin (Dice Quivis)? Agriope 05:04, 12 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Well, we have the start of an article on Dies Viridis. ¶ Re: "Dice." You might want to recheck your paradigm. ::winkwink:: IacobusAmor 02:47, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, a couple of things there. Proper imperative of dicere is dic. And as far as quivis it should be quidvis or maybe better quodlibet but certainly better aliquid. "Anything" and "whatever" are close, but not equivalent.--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:42, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Quivis is stated in our book to be used for deliberate choice while quilibet expresses blind choice. Did you mean to say either of them would be a better choice than aliquid, or that aliquid would be the better option? Agriope 03:08, 14 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

I think aliquid is best...--Ioshus ^(disp) 06:18, 14 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks guys--I'll probably be asking lots more weird questions as I get close to finishing my article. Agriope 00:00, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Ha! Nothing in any wiki is ever "finished" ! IacobusAmor 02:44, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Lord knows that's the truth! Just check out Scacchi...featured article, yet, SOOO much work to do...--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:42, 13 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

An editor's work is never done. I'm still learning that one! Agriope 03:08, 14 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Declinatio "asteroidae" sive "asteroidis"

Scire velim, amabo, quae sit opinio tua de declinatione vocabuli “asteroides”. Vide et commentare, sis, quod scripsi hac de re in pagina Disputatio:Asteroides#Declination. Vale, --Fabullus 15:19, 22 Maii 2007 (UTC)

deletion

Hi Rolandus,

could you please delete the userpage that has been nominated by me (see [1] )? It contains personal information and is an insult in german. Please also block the account. Thanks a lot. (I dont mention the page here directly, as that would be duplication of the insult etc, thanks for the understanding) Effeietsanders 09:31, 27 Maii 2007 (UTC)