Disputatio Usoris:MinPer

Salve, MinPer!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Ops nexusque usoribus novis ( ca, de, en, es, ia, it, ru, ro, no, tl, eo)
De orthographia ( ca, en, es, tl)
Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
Taberna
Lexica Neolatina
Lexica Latina interretialia
Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
Fontes nominum geographicorum
Index formularum

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

Bene venisti apud nos. Norma Vicipaediae Latinae est praenomina Christiana hominum recentiorum Latine convertere, sicut et alii Latinistae faciunt, e.g. qui Latine apud universitates civitatemque Vaticanam scribunt. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:39, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:39, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked ...[fontem recensere]

... this account because it was used repeatedly to move pages against consensus. The summary was given "los nombres no se cambian", but this is not true. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:03, 6 Augusti 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I write in English because I'm not interested in a dead language. The name is Pedro Cateriano, not Petrus Cateriano. Or in English Wikipedia we use "Peter Cateriano"?? No!!

Hola. Escribo en español porque no estoy interesado en una lengua muerta. El nombre es Pedro Cateriano, no Petrus Cateriano. ¿Acaso en la Wikipedia en inglés el artículo es Peter Cateriano? ¡No! MinPer (disputatio) 16:09, 6 Augusti 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, OK, if you're not interested in a dead language you have perhaps no reason to edit Vicipaedia. But if you wish to do so in accordance with our current consensus, or indeed to discuss it, you are welcome to do so. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:58, 6 Augusti 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in correcting misspelling names. MinPer (disputatio) 21:15, 6 Augusti 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vicipaedia is a collaborative effort, so, if a spelling that some Vicipaedians think correct modern Latin is said by you to be misspelling, you will need to discuss before changing.

It's worth remembering, perhaps, that the Wikipedias are not official sources and do not always choose official names as page titles. For example, the usual rule on the English Wikipedia (your example above) is not to choose official names, but the usual name in English sources.

In the same way, the Latin Vicipaedia article about the man who is now pope was at first called Georgius Marius Bergoglio. This is not a misspelling, it is the form of his name that was used in Latin sources both official like this and this and unofficial like this. It is normal in Latin writing to convert Christian forenames to Latin in this way. If Pedro Cateriano is given an honorary degree by a university (as probably will happen!) it is likely that his name will appear officially in this Latin form. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:56, 7 Augusti 2016 (UTC)[reply]