Disputatio Usoris:Mclay1

Salve, Mclay1!

Gratus in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Ops nexusque usoribus novis ( ca, de, en, es, ia, it, ru, ro, no, tl, eo)
De orthographia ( ca, en, es, tl)
Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
Taberna
Lexica Neolatina
Lexica Latina interretialia
Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
Fontes nominum geographicorum
Index formularum

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" fieri velle!

Please comment at Disputatio:Australia -- thanks! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:51, 22 Iulii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Divisorunt =?[fontem recensere]

Mclay1, in commentario de Alexandro Magno, vocabulum diviserunt ad divisorunt hodie mutasti. Quid significat divisorunt, hoc verbum arcanum? IacobusAmor 10:52, 1 Augusti 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak Latin but I think you're questioning the "typo correction" on "Alexander Magnus". I think, for some reason, AWB is correcting English typos or something. I've already brought it up on the English Wikipedia. I've been trying to undo them but clearly I missed that one. Mclay1 10:57, 1 Augusti 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's another point -- AWB turned <ref>{{Citatio desiderata}}</ref> into {{Citatio desiderata}} (I noticed this at Abecedarium Graecum). That won't quite do: either {{Citatio desiderata}} needs to be redesigned so that it is always a footnote, like {{Convertimus}}, or the ref tags need to remain. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:19, 1 Augusti 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did that manually. I just assumed {{Citatio desiderata}} worked the same as en:Template:Citation needed. Mclay1 06:22, 4 Augusti 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the time the formula was designed, someone argued against that method (I seem to remember), so it wasn't adopted. We probably should. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:38, 4 Augusti 2011 (UTC)[reply]