Disputatio Usoris:Magistra siderea
Mentula is a strong word in latin. Besides, writing, as you did, in David Cameron, that the subject of the article put his penis in a dead's person mouth, may be considered vandalism, unless you give a reliable source for that. And even if, mentula would have to be avoided. Read thouroughly through en:WP:WD. And take a look too to Vicipaedia:Praefatio. Wish you a good editing. Pápiliunculus (disputatio) 18:16, 29 Aprilis 2022 (UTC)
- I used 'sus' as the word for a pig, given that porcia or porcus can be used to refer to a woman's genitalia. If you could help me place the word "allegedly" with grammatical correctness in the article, I will happily provide several citations.
- Is there a more neutral word for a penis than "mentula"? I always understood it to be the most common word for the male member in Latin. Please could you advise as to the more appropriate term? Magistra siderea (disputatio) 19:36, 29 Aprilis 2022 (UTC)
- Check en:Latin_obscenity#Mentula:_the_penis : mentula is an obscene word. It has its place in an encyclopedia, or dictionary, when you're describing the word itself, its use, or you're citing someone else's usage, as in said en:Latin_obscenity#Mentula:_the_penis, or wiktionary:en:mentula#Latin. You can't use it as a describer, as a word you use to describe a penis. Check en:Wikipedia:Offensive material. Pápiliunculus (disputatio) 08:39, 30 Aprilis 2022 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I get it - thank you for the correction! Magistra siderea (disputatio) 11:37, 30 Aprilis 2022 (UTC)
- Check en:Latin_obscenity#Mentula:_the_penis : mentula is an obscene word. It has its place in an encyclopedia, or dictionary, when you're describing the word itself, its use, or you're citing someone else's usage, as in said en:Latin_obscenity#Mentula:_the_penis, or wiktionary:en:mentula#Latin. You can't use it as a describer, as a word you use to describe a penis. Check en:Wikipedia:Offensive material. Pápiliunculus (disputatio) 08:39, 30 Aprilis 2022 (UTC)