Disputatio Usoris:Jamesp~lawiki

Salve, Iacobe!

Gratus in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

• Ops nexusque usoribus novis ( ca,  de,  en,  es,   ia,  it,  ru,  ro,  no,  tl,  eo)
• De orthographia ( ca,  en,  es,  tl)
• Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
• Taberna
• Lexica Neolatina
• Lexica Latina interretialia
• Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
• Fontes nominum geographicorum
• Index formularum

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" fieri velle!

Welcome again to the Vicipaedia: I'll try to make this clear in order to avoid further confusion. First and foremost, if indeed you user pages were being hacked, you should understand that from vicipaedia we must respond, firstly by temporary blocking (which led you to open your sockpuppet accounts, which you shouldn't have done), and then, if the probelms seems not to be solved, by permanent blocking. If you were not responsible for the content put in here through your accounts, then you should take no offence to the comments (insults¿?) made on the disputatio pages, for they were not aiming at you, but the hacker. I would ask youi some more comprehension from your part on this matter. Try also to think that we had had another tense situation with your friend Harrissimo, involving similar things, and we do not like vandals here - he apologised and everything was solved.

It doesn't seem proper either if you apologise but still start your page with "STAY AWAY".

On other matters, your article on Vespasian, you would have expected and then checked that we already had an article on Vespasian. Certainly Vespasian is not a Latin name. Try to be more careful in these aspects, so we can avoid unecessary redirects.--Xaverius 16:25, 24 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

Your blocking

Xaverius writes with friendly advice. I write as a magistratus of Vicipaedia.

Your usernames were blocked because they were used for vandalising a user page (see this evidence) and for abuse (see this evidence).

You have had no insults from me or from Ioshus. In fact, you have had good advice from both of us: from Ioshus, not to use online translators; from me, how to look for Latin names of places.

We magistratus are busy people: we are all volunteers, and we have other things to do besides Vicipaedia. Still, we are happy to give time to helping users who really want to contribute and really want to learn Latin.

If you want to work on Vicipaedia, you will have to work with us and with other users, be polite, and not threaten; you will have to accept and learn from criticism (just as we all do); and you must not warn us to stay away from your user page. For the moment, this username has not been blocked. Whether it remains open depends on how you respond to this message. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:34, 24 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry, it just seemed to me at the time that the comments were being given to me, until I realised that they were not. I would be very happy if all the content on my talk page could be deleted and I could start again. Thanks Jamesp 19:17, 24 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Alex Potts

(P.S would it be possible to use a different name, as I am just going to forget this one?)

We'll wait and observe for a short while. Meanwhile, remember it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:48, 25 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

what do you mean made up?

just google Ledesia...--Ioshus ^(disp) 18:23, 27 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

Alex/Jamesp/whoever, the fact that Leeds is not a Roman site does not mean that it has no Latin name--Xaverius 18:36, 27 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

... because Latin isn't a monopoly of the Romans. It was still widely used, as an everyday written language, all through Anglo-Saxon and medieval times and until not so very long ago. Texts from those times contain plenty of names, of people and places, that the Romans wouldn't have known; but they are still Latin. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:51, 27 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jamesp. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jamesp~lawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:13, 18 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Nomen novum tributum est

Si hoc novum nomen tuum est, potes pristino nomine uti ut certior melius fias. Si novum nomen tibi non placet, potes tuum deligere. Utere hoc situ: Specialis:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

09:24, 19 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)