Disputatio Categoriae:Reproductio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

The cladistics here[fontem recensere]

Conceptually following Wikipedia, this category had been a subset of "Biological processes," which had been a subset of "Biology," but Pantocrator has made it a subset of "Procreation," which becomes a subset of "Biology." (What's the rationale for obliterating the distinction between biology and biological processes?) Following the English terms, "Procreation" will now seem to include articles equivalent to these: "Abortion, Adelphogamy, Allogamy, Alternation of generations, Animal sexual behaviour, Anisogamy, Antral follicle, Apophallation, Arrhenotoky, Artificial reproduction, Artificial insemination, Asexual reproduction, Assisted reproductive technology, Associated reproductive pattern, Assortative mating, Avian incubation," and so on. Many of course do address procreation. IacobusAmor 13:28, 12 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was already in 'Procreation', and I have no opinion right now about that. I only removed 'Biological Processes', a category with no other members; and that was done (as mentioned on Disputatio Categoriae:Omnia) to empty 'Categoria:Notiones', which contained only this. Pantocrator 13:33, 12 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
Over in Wikipedia, the category "Biological processes" has seven subcategories:
Cellular processes (5 C, 55 P)
Evolutionary processes (5 C)
Immune system process (1 P) M
Memory processes (74 P)
Pigmentation (1 C, 4 P)
Reproduction (15 C, 132 P) V
Viral life cycle (5 P)
and fifteen pages:
Biological process
Assimilation (biology)
Barker's hypothesis
Biochemical cascade
Convergent extension
Immunoglobulin class switching
Mineralization (biology)
Radical (chemistry)
The chemical basis of morphogenesis
Vicipaedia will someday want to have articles on these topics. IacobusAmor 15:29, 12 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That category is already under Biologia where it should belong if it is to exist. Pantocrator 23:54, 12 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As first created, this category duplicated the already-existing "Procreatio"; hence it has no interwikis. What we lacked was a category "Reproductio humana". For the present I am interwiki-ing this one as "Reproductio humana". Perhaps it should be deleted and re-created under that name. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:55, 12 Februarii 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]