Disputatio:Tao te kim

Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae „Tao Te Ching“ sitús en.wikipedia.org orta est. Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus. Deutsch Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Tao Te Ching“ aus en.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar. English The attached page originated as a translation from the page "Tao Te Ching" on the site en.wikipedia.org. We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here. Esperanto La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de „Tao Te Ching“ el en.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.

De titulo

I think we should move this. By my interpretation, we would move it to the Chinese title if there had not been a Latin translation. But there has been -- a manuscript written c. 1721 by Jean-François Noëlas, published in 2008 by Claudia von Collani and others. Its title is Tao te kim, or, in full, Liber sinicus, Tao te kim inscriptus, in Latinum idioma versus. Details are

• Catalogue entry including part title in Latin
• Story of manuscript and research

See also the title page which I have just uploaded to Commons. I suggest (but a bit hesitantly) that our pagename should therefore be Tao te kim, which is the published Latin title; compare, for example, Y-king. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:09, 1 Octobris 2017 (UTC)