Disputatio:Sophophonum

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

movenda ad sollerterphonascum[fontem recensere]

Forsan, sollerterphonascum melius sit secundum Élizabeth Antébi et Marie-France Saignes in suorum blog-ibus.?(Gratias a Leonellum Pons pro has nuntiones)Quod tibi videtur?

Perhaps sollerterphonascum is better, according to Élizabeth Antébi et Marie-France Saignes in their blogs? ((Thanks to Leonellus Pons for this info)How do you guys feel about this?Jondel (disputatio) 00:54, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe sollerterphonascum is better, I don't know enough to make a decisive argument, though I would prefer if we could at least have Sophophoum in the body. The issue is not an easy one - barely used - and we could as well use something like telephonicum saepiens (an intelligent phone) :) . the adverb "sollerter" seems wrong to me ("A cleverly phone?"), instead perhaps sollersphonascum? But I'd keep to the two words: telephonum sollers or telephonum saepiens.--Nicolaus Augurinus (disputatio) 01:08, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neither do I know enough but for the meantime, your opinions matter thanks.Jondel (disputatio) 01:24, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ephemeris(a publishing authority) used sophophonum (got that right I hope) and thus that might be preferable. Jondel (disputatio) 01:28, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed--Nicolaus Augurinus (disputatio) 01:37, 4 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]