Disputatio:Senectus
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Old age” sitūs en:.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
Citius purgavi?[fontem recensere]
I cleaned out some English debris without realising the page was only a week old. If work is continuing and that material is needed, feel free to revert! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:35, 7 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
One-line summary at top of article is inconsistent with article.[fontem recensere]
The one-line summary at the top of the article takes "senectus" to mean a person who is in his old age. That is apparently the less common meaning of the word. The article itself assumes the more common meaning of "senectus" as a stage of life, i.e., old age itself. The one-liner should be fixed to be consistent with the body of the article. (If and when I have an opportunity to make that fix, I plan to do so. But if anyone else can get to it sooner, please do.) Toddcs (disputatio) 23:36, 19 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
- @Toddcs: Sommarium de quo loqueris non video. Hoc est initium commentationis:
- Senectus (-utis, f.) consistit in aetatibus quae spem vitae hominum approprinquant vel excedunt, et ergo finem circuli vitae humanae attingit.
- Quae pars sit mutanda? --Grufo (disputatio) 03:05, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
- @Grufo
- I am in the mobile Wikipedia app (Beta).
- Before what you quoted, there is an intro:
- Senectus
- magnam aetatem habens, multos annos natus; qui est multorum annorum
- You don't see it? Toddcs (disputatio) 03:12, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
- Ah! Quod vides in telephono gestabili non est pars Vicipaediae Latinae, sed est pars Vicidatorum (d:Q191089), ubi multi usores, qui non necessarie Latine loquuntur, scribunt. --Grufo (disputatio) 04:17, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have the app. After seeing this I have edited the entry at Wikidata, and the mobile page that I can see now begins "Wikidata: senectus (Q191089), aetas humana". Is it the same on the app? The second element is not really intended to be a definition, it's intended to put the term into a more general category.
- You just have to understand that Wikidata is not Vicipaedia. It's possible for any of us to edit Wikidata -- in fact it's highly desirable to make it agree with Vicipaedia -- I often edit it for this purpose. But Grufo's right, others also edit Wikidata, and they are often entirely ignorant of the languages they think they are writing. We can't guarantee it will remain accurate. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:10, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
- Ah! Quod vides in telephono gestabili non est pars Vicipaediae Latinae, sed est pars Vicidatorum (d:Q191089), ubi multi usores, qui non necessarie Latine loquuntur, scribunt. --Grufo (disputatio) 04:17, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)