Disputatio:Lingua gesticulatoria Nicaraguensis
|
Lingua gesticulatoria Nicaraguensis fuit Translatio Hebdomadalis. |
Words[fontem recensere]
De: "(YOUR dubsigs ARE NOT NECESSARYHERE AND EXCESSIVE IACOBUS, WHY ARE THEY NECESSARY?!!)." No matter how loudly you insist, your necesarrias isn't a word? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:52, 1 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- I appreciate your response Iacobus. Let's remove it then. Please provide some direction, why there are dubsigs and even more. You could also simply correct. You know I am doing my best. If the mistake is easy to correct, one or two spelling mistakes, please do so. --Jondel (disputatio) 02:02, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- In a hurry, that can't always be done; hence dubsig. Notions of necessity in idiomatic Latin are often not conveyed by "est necessarius." One can often identify a problem but not know the best solution; hence dubsig. Time lacking now. Busy. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 04:01, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- But in this case, the removal of one r would be too much (?)--Jondel (disputatio) 04:44, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- In a hurry, that can't always be done; hence dubsig. Notions of necessity in idiomatic Latin are often not conveyed by "est necessarius." One can often identify a problem but not know the best solution; hence dubsig. Time lacking now. Busy. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 04:01, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- I am not asking for a whole rewrite which would consume too much time and effort. No. --Jondel (disputatio) 01:52, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- I respect your latin proficiency Iacobus, but I do check the words. It seems necessarias is a word (?)--Jondel (disputatio) 02:02, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- "It seems necessarias is a word."—Yes, but necesarrias is not. :) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 04:01, 2 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
De hac translatione hebdomadali[fontem recensere]
Fuitne haec pagina Translatio Hebdomadalis? Titulum in historia formulae {{Translatio hebdomadalis}} apud mensem Octobris 2012 non inveni. --Grufo (disputatio) 18:34, 12 Septembris 2023 (UTC)