Disputatio:Ioannes Lennon

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ma voi state fuori di testa ....che cacchio fate un enciclopedia in latino?

Calendarium Romanum et numeri Romani[fontem recensere]

Previous recensio said he was born "a.d.IX.Id.Oct."—but that's an impossible date, as the day before VIII Id. Oct. is not IX Id. Oct., but the nones; and it's the wrong date anyway, because the nones of October are the seventh, but (according to Wikipedia) Lennon was born on the ninth! (So the right date in the Roman calendar is VII Id. Oct.) A clear example of why INEXPERT LATINISTS SHOULD NOT USE ROMAN NUMERALS & ROMAN DATES? IacobusAmor 17:31, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I mean, I don't even trust myself to handle roman numerlas and dates properly. I certainly don't trust a million monkeys with a typewriter =].--Ioshus (disp) 18:26, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Profecto hoc mirum est argumentum. Quod aliquis errorem fecerit, ideo rationem Romanam dies numerandi non esse adhibendam? Quid? Ergo siquis non noverit, cuius generis vox domus sit, ut ille qui in hac pagina de domo Dacotano (sic!) deliravit, is hoc verbum ipsum fugere debebit? Id si rectum est, omnes ab hac vicipaedia arcendi sunt, qui linguae Latinae ipsius non satis periti videantur, ut prorsus vel duo vel nemo in hac re desudent. Satius est corrigere errores, ut melius fiat pagina de Ioanne Lennone scripta, quam carpere eos, qui ad exemplum auctorum optimum latinitatem suam excolere volunt.--Irenaeus 22:45, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)