Disputatio:Index actuum legiferorum Unionis Europaeae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

legisferorum?[fontem recensere]

De qua voce forma legisferorum deducitur? --Bavarese (disputatio) 11:31, 12 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you say it, I think it should be legifer, not legisfer. Or did you have something else in mind? Sigur (disputatio) 11:48, 12 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just lex (so here: index legum)? Isn't that what a "law-bearing act" is? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:40, 12 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can definitely live with lex, but I was trying to be cautions: Law/loi/Gesetz was in the aborted Constitutional Treaty; it was part of the symbolism that was abandoned. Now they have legislative acts and procedures (officially!) but (officially) no laws. So, I'm not sure we should do this, but if there is a consensus, I'll be happy with lex. Sigur (disputatio) 15:19, 12 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm already taking out the s; it's definitely wrong. Open to further suggestions. Sigur (disputatio) 20:17, 12 Martii 2019 (UTC)[reply]