Disputatio:Grex promotorius Nationum Unitarum
Titulus[fontem recensere]
Oportet nomen mutare (sed quo modo incertus sum!) Hic enim habemus verba in casu nominativo tria sine nexu grammaticali, id quod Latinitati haud congruit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:40, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
- Quomodo videtur "Grex Evolutio Consociationis Nationum"?Jondel (disputatio) 23:20, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
- It's better to constrain the use of the word evolutio to biological contexts only (and, of course, classically, when it comes to unrolling or opening a book). My suggestion: Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. ¶ By the way, do we have an extra-Vicipaedian source for "Consociatio Nationum". My sources have Nationes Unitae (Reijo Pitkäranta) or Unitae Nationes (Ebbe Vilborg). Neander (disputatio) 00:29, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
- Very nice Neander! Let's wait a bit until everyone is a bit comfortable, then make the name change.Jondel (disputatio) 01:24, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
- It's better to constrain the use of the word evolutio to biological contexts only (and, of course, classically, when it comes to unrolling or opening a book). My suggestion: Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. ¶ By the way, do we have an extra-Vicipaedian source for "Consociatio Nationum". My sources have Nationes Unitae (Reijo Pitkäranta) or Unitae Nationes (Ebbe Vilborg). Neander (disputatio) 00:29, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
Ok. I am moving this to Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. Jondel (disputatio) 23:28, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)