Disputatio:Rationes inter imperia Sinicum et Romanum
|
Rationes inter imperia Sinicum et Romanum fuit pagina mensis Februarii 2018. |
plurale?[fontem recensere]
An melius " ... imperia ... "? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:18, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Ita, imperia! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:20, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Haesitabam, quia nonnulla exempla talium locutionum, qualium "lingua Graeca et Latina" ([1]) Sed fortasse recte dicite. Si omnes consentimus, ad "imperia" movebo. Aliter possumus enwiki sequi et scribere "rationes Sino-Romanae". Lesgles (disputatio) 14:53, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Haesito et ego: talibus rebus linguae naturales non semper logicam "mathematicam" observant. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:04, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe inter Sinicum et Romanum imperium would work, the first imperium being understood. Or pluralize everything, as in Monumenta Graeca et Romana; this works, too, with arts, cities, coins, rivers, soldiers, and other things usually plural, but maybe not with empires, which are usually one-at-a-time entities in their proper locations? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:33, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- OK, since I haven't found any classical parallels for either construction, I changed it to imperia, which feels better to me as well. Lesgles (disputatio) 12:20, 29 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe inter Sinicum et Romanum imperium would work, the first imperium being understood. Or pluralize everything, as in Monumenta Graeca et Romana; this works, too, with arts, cities, coins, rivers, soldiers, and other things usually plural, but maybe not with empires, which are usually one-at-a-time entities in their proper locations? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:33, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Haesito et ego: talibus rebus linguae naturales non semper logicam "mathematicam" observant. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:04, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)
- Haesitabam, quia nonnulla exempla talium locutionum, qualium "lingua Graeca et Latina" ([1]) Sed fortasse recte dicite. Si omnes consentimus, ad "imperia" movebo. Aliter possumus enwiki sequi et scribere "rationes Sino-Romanae". Lesgles (disputatio) 14:53, 25 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)