Disputatio:Index rerum urbanis studiis
Merge?[fontem recensere]
I'm not certain whether we have the material for a Vicipaedia article here yet. Should we merge this into Urbs, or develop it further? Anyway, I'll put in a link from Urbs and I've added categories. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:23, 29 Iunii 2012 (UTC)
- I translated this from the English wiki as requested. I could transfer the fons from there. What would be needed material/contents? --Jondel (disputatio) 10:10, 29 Iunii 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, I wasn't aware of any request! I'm sure you made a good start, Jondel. We don't have many lists of articles, and this one is as yet very short (naturally, because it's new). If list-articles remain short for years and years, what sometimes happens is that they get marked "Non stipula" and are deleted, but there's lots of time before that might happen. Maybe the user who requested it plans to add more? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:23, 29 Iunii 2012 (UTC)
- This is the page. The 'years and years' is really plenty enough time.--Jondel (disputatio) 07:06, 1 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, I wasn't aware of any request! I'm sure you made a good start, Jondel. We don't have many lists of articles, and this one is as yet very short (naturally, because it's new). If list-articles remain short for years and years, what sometimes happens is that they get marked "Non stipula" and are deleted, but there's lots of time before that might happen. Maybe the user who requested it plans to add more? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:23, 29 Iunii 2012 (UTC)