Disputatio:Carthago

Shouldn't the name of this artivle be Karthago since that was the name which was used at the time. Secondly, the letter C had not yet replaces K, so Karthago with a K would be more suitable. 91.155.81.193 17:22, 13 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely.--Ioscius ^(disp) 18:08, 15 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non est Vicipaediam Anglicam! Dic Latina.

Dic Latine. Harrissimo 23:43, 15 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Vicipaedia Anglica. Wereon 21:13, 4 Octobris 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dido sicut conditor Carthaginis urbis? Scilicet apud Vergilium, sed haud re vera. Raconensis

Corrige igitur! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:14, 18 Novembris 2008 (UTC)[reply]

De K et C[fontem recensere]

Animadverto autem et Lewis & Short, et Oxford Latin Dictionary, et Thesaurum Linguae Latinae (pp. 212–213) prioritatem scripturae Carthago dare (et vide in TLL longum de scriptura commentarium). Insuper apud PHI Latin texts reperio 655 Carthag- et tantum 75 Karthag-. Quid censent alii? Lesgles (disputatio) 19:17, 28 Februarii 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's no doubt not the most scientific measurement, but for what it's worth, Google has 657 hits for "ceterum censeo karthaginem esse delendam" against a mere 67 100 for "ceterum censeo carthaginem esse delendam"... Sigur (disputatio) 19:51, 28 Februarii 2020 (UTC)[reply]