Jump to content

Usor:Autonomous agent 5/Harenarium

E Vicipaedia

abominari, aedes, ager, ara, arbor felix, attrectare, augur, auguraculum, augurium, auspex, auspicia, auspicia impetrativa, auspicia maiora, auspicia oblativa, auspicia privata, averruncare.

bellum iustum

caerimonia, calator, capite velato, carmen, castus castitas, cinctus gabinus, clavum figere, collegium, comitia calata, commentarii augurales, commentarii pontificum, coniectura, consecratio, cultus

decretum, delubrum, detestatio sacrorum, deus dea di dii, devotio, dies imperii, dies lustricus, dies natalis, dies religiosus, dies vitiosus, dirae, disciplina Etrusca, divus, do ut des

effatio, evocatio, exauguratio, eximius, exta

fanaticus, fanum, fata deorum, fas, fasti, felix, feria, festus, fetial, finis, flamen, Fratres Arvales

Gabinus

hostia

inauguratio, indigitamenta, invocatio, ius, ius divinum

lectisternium, lex, libatio, liberatio, libri augurales, libri pontificales, litatio, lituus, lucus, ludi, Luperci, lustratio

manubia, miraculum, mola salsa, monstrum, mundus

nefandum, nefas, nefastus, nemus, nuntiatio

obnuntiatio, observatio, omen, ostentarium, ostentum, ordo sacerdotum

paludatus, pax deorum, piaculum, pius, pietas, pollucere, pontifex, popa, porricere, portentum, precatio, prex, prodigium, profanum, propitius; praepetes (aves), pulvinar

regina sacrorum, religio, religiosus, res divinae, responsum, rex sacrorum, ritus, ritus graecus

sacellum, sacer, sacerdos, sacra, sacra gentilicia, sacra municipalia, sacramentum, sacrarium, sacrificium, sacrosanctus, Salii, sancio, sanctus, servare de caelo, signum, silentium, sinister, sodalitas, spectio, sponsio, superstitio, supplicatio

tabernaculum, templum

verba certa, verba concepta, ver sacrum, victima, victimarius, vitium, vitulari, votum







































































































Given that momentum in the universum understood after Lamaitre's theoria [1], has certain implications as to the originis of the current universum, the projection (in human consciousness) of tempus into praeterita indicates logically the existence of aeternitas, a factor which is unrefutable, given that something exists praeterita before the principium momentum ("constant et augendae radii ratio"), is obvious, and that should any theoria as to originis of the situ before the principium momentum seem more scientifically plausible than another, and consequently gain more favour and become more accepted, this creates the problem of the cause of the cause of principium momentum - ad infinitum, as each debate and acceptence of a cause creates the same situation of debate as to cause in the preceeding. Because there is no actual scientific method to examine the causes in the Lamaitre model due to the fact of no possibly identifiable evidence to prove the cause from the singularity, due to the fact of the singularity being infinitely dense and hot, is not a measure which has any possible inclusion to science at the factor "in infinitum" - just as universum extending into the praeterita in aeternum creates no scope for scientific examination as there is no data or evidence to locate at an eternal temporal location, as aeternitas is never locatable.

Datam illam mutationem in universum intellectam post Lamaitre theoriam - habet quasdam tacitis condicionibus

αλλαγή του σύμπαντος κατανοητή από τη θεωρία του Lamaitre - έχει ορισμένες επιπτώσεις


Accepting that the use of the word "infinitely" [2] negates any scientific examination this obviously additionally negates any possible answer that has any possible scientific value - since the necessity of proof from evidence, is science[3], and there is no possible evidence to locate at the singularity.


Accepting tempus praeterita (το παρελθόν) at the initium (mysterium, arcanum, secretum, αρχή) of universum = α - at any tempus knowing α excludes the idea of aeternitas (ΑΆαά Ββ Γγ Δδ ΕΈεέ Ζζ ΗΉηή Θθ ΙΊιί Κκ Λλ Μμ Νν Ξξ ΟΌοό Ππ Ρρ Σσ ς Ττ ΥΎυύ Φφ Χχ Ψψ ΩΏ ωώ) - which is logically existing by scientia of numeri increasing or decreasing away from nulla (μηδέν), although the idea of aeternitas (αιωνιότης) is not shown by science and only exists in the mens humana, applying α into any doctrina shows there is no pre-existing littera to apply - ergo ΩΏ ωώ is the application which shows α - finis.

Ω (forma imago simile est) id est omegatone (= 21:01, 26 Iulii 2022‎) ΑΆαάἀἁἂἃἄἅἆἇἈἉἊἋἌἍἎἏ - ΩΏωώῲῳῴῶῷῸΌῺΏῼ ergo μοναδικότητα est ΑΆἈἉἊἋἌἍἎἏ


In the actually praesens ex tempore praesenti all information is possible, through the praeterita the moles of information available becomes minus, proportionate with the moles de tempus into the praeterita - i.e. minus info is available by plus past-time, ergo, if this is verum, the actual evidence and provability of the past of the universum is at some tempus nulla. Having therefore located this nulla this indicates since if this nulla existentia existed, the existentia of the same nulla state in the current universum, which is projecting into the futurum, since tota ex tempore praesenti existing things are connected to past things and future things (id est no possible nulla physica est ergo quanta physica < is not a reality (because no real to make reality from).


fin infini infinitum in fin enfin τέλος άπειρο


Ω

Α

ω (l'espace de le principium momentum - ante avant)

l'univers en le Graecae intellectus (planiciem aquae)

α (principium momentum - antecessum avance)

EM towards (coelescing) and away (disintegrating) from existing - momentum E est le cause of change

a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j10k11l12m13n14o15p16q17r8s9t20u1v2w3x4y5z6, Αα1 Ββ2 Γγ3 Δδ4 Εε5 Ζζ6 Ηη7 Θθ8 Ιι9 Κκ 10XΔ Λλ11 Μμ2 Νν3 Ξξ4 Οο5 Ππ6 Ρρ7 Σσς8 Ττ9 Υυ20 Φφ1 Χχ2 Ψψ3 ΩΏ4 ωώ5

abellana, corylus nucis: M, &,et, nulla - E, mediates, mediat, interpono; momentum

ε ← quanta → inane,vacuum (inanis → ⇐ ἐπιστήμη|| inexplicabilis)


orange (frut) est orange building (construire) a building (batiment)

e tern (momentum) it (chose) a (defini)

e (avis) tern (oiselle) terminatio ||

expansum diffusilis ⇔ infin ← fin

divisio terme e+m+pty

<< teg >>

moo u c av est

grande boom

moo u (c av e)st


5 + 13 = 18 ∞

(situ anglicus originis, quia ∞ originis est)

Ω + 1ω = 1∞

(anglicus ⇔ anguli gradus est)

divisioπ


"simbolo Mt" ⇐ divisio terme e+m+pty (16 + 20 = 36y)


2(3)4 6 ∞

∞ = 0 [4](valu) = inexplicabilis


(2)18 = 36 O = anguli gradus = academia (universum)

1← ⇒[2 3 4 (5) 6 (7) 8 (9)] ←[1 (0 = ∞) = 10 = 18]


24 tempus ⇒ 567 8 → (9)10 ∞|inexplicabilis


etiam - diversus (universum)

ammirabilis - paradoxon (definitio, constitutum, liquidum)


pre empt ⇔ antidate

όχι ⇔ αριθμητική τιμή

in motu continuo contra (αντίθεση) corporis (φυσικός) definitione et numero → μη αντιληπτό → κενός κενώ

universum: θέμα θέσης - ουσία : αδειανός - ξενοίκιαστος :vocivus


infinitum semper recedit (κατά φαντασίαν, cosmos phantasmaticus), universum recedit - tum exteriora movere

invisibilis ad maximum observatum spatium

τέλος - τηλεσκόπιο


∞ = naut (valu) = - ic (inexplicabilis)









  1. G. Lemaître « Un univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques », in Annales de la société scientifique de Bruxelles, volume 47A, p. 49-59, 1927. (url ici de l'archives de l'Université catholique de Louvain)
  2. source here used only as one of any other example and was the first listed from search return https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html
  3. Loevinger, L. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29762257, Aab 1992 - https://www.jstor.org/ (JSTOR)
  4. R. Penrose Twistor Algebra Math. Phys. 8, 345 (1967); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1705200, https://aip.scitation.org/ 21 Dicembre 2004

Bibliographia

[recensere | fontem recensere]

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=before+the+big+bang&btnG=

(Universitas Osloensis) - Are Raklev & Torsten Bringmann ⇐ https://phys.org/news/2021-03-myths-big.html (Elise Kjørstad)

Ahmed Farag Ali (Université de Banha), Saurya Das (Université de Lethbridge) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314009381 ⇐ William Hall https://www.christianexaminer.com/news/scientists-say-no-big-bang-just-eternity.html (archivum)

|(Universitas Chicaginiensis) J. B. Hartle and (Università della California, Universitas Cantabrigiensis) S. W. Hawking "...There are excited states which represent universes which expand from zero volume..." https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960/ (archivum) ⇐ "..has a diameter of zero..smoothly expanded from a point of zero size..." https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-debate-hawkings-idea-that-the-universe-had-no-beginning-20190606/ (Wolchover)| ▷ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268641300037X

Robert J. Nemiroff (Université technologique du Michigan) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/according-to-the-big-bang/

https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/philosophy/staff/86/robin-le-poidevin file:///C:/Users/a1b2c/Downloads/10.4324_9780203422069_previewpdf.pdf

Abed Peerally (Université de Maurice) https://rxiv.org/abs/1710.0085

R. Penrose Twistor Algebra Math. Phys. 8, 345 (1967); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1705200, https://aip.scitation.org/ 21 Dicembre 2004

Lukas Wenzl http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/our-solar-system/the-moon/101-the-universe/cosmology-and-the-big-bang/general-questions/1098-but-seriously-what-was-there-before-the-big-bang-beginner http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/