Disputatio Usoris:Silence~lawiki

Salve Adamas et ave. Gratum te hic accipimus. Sed mihi placet, Adamas, cum Vicipaedianis saepe contribuentibus nuntiis instantaneis confabulari posse. Visne, quaeso, ad me epistolam electronicam mittere certior ut fiam quomodo te interretialiter adeam?

Gratias tibi et vale, Iustinus 17:15 sep 2, 2005 (UTC)

Salve, Iustine! Ubi coniunxi, erravi et e-inscriptio non relata est. Electronica inscriptio mea NICKMANRMB@yahoo.com est. Estne nunc modus illam hic addere? --Adamas 18:19 sep 2, 2005 (UTC)

Nisi fallor, Specialis:Preferences est pagina quam vis. --Iustinus 18:45 sep 2, 2005 (UTC)

Iazium

Salve Adamas, et gratias ago te accipiendum tribulationem magnam et ingratam permutandi cunctas istas "j" in "i". Pagina "Jazium" exstabat de mense februarii MMIV, tamen brevissima primo erat, sub littera "J", et in initio, ego quoque consideravi suscipere commutationem in "I". Attamen, non fui certus et denique mihi videbatur esse melius retinere versionem originalem. Nunc, mihi necesse est confiteri rem acu tetigisti, et me delectat maxime verbum "Iazium". --Bottomline 08:17 sep 3, 2005 (UTC)

Categoria:User la-2

Hi, I think your language templates do not work because of a typo. It should be Usor instead of User. --Roland2 19:54, 30 Decembris 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias ago

Qv. Saxum Volutum aut Saxa Voluta D Ambulans 12:54, 4 Martii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vicipaedia et Victionarium

Didn't want you to think I was ignoring your comment. I was taking a minute to think about it, before responding, something that I feel I ought do much more often in life...think before responding that is. While I still disagree with you, I don't disagree enough to promote the wholehearted omission of declension notes in articles. I have talked with other editors and administrators whose opinion I respect on this matter, and none of them raised any objection to declension notes. So I thought about why exactly it ruffles my feathers, so to speak, and I believe that it's really a matter of uniformity. Strictly speaking, I think a source for the gender of nouns and declension patterns is definitely what Vicipaedia is not. I believe Vicipaedia to be an online community but foremost an encyclopaedia which tells about the subject of its entries, and not on their specific morphological qualities(unless of course it's a philological article in itself). I have read various antique pseudy encyclopaedias, and other reference works, and none of them include gender and genitive in their entries, so to do so now is definitely not in accord with tradition. But you make a fine point about the linkability to Victionarium with the declension note(though it seems a more useful link would really be from Victionario to here). My main issue, then, is of consistency, we should all do it, or we should all not do it, and therefore I think the question may deserve platform in the Taberna.--Ioshus Rocchio 14:48, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

McDonaldi

This is exactly the form I used in a translation exercise in comp class. I thought it was kind of funny. Another good neolatin word is googlere. See Disputatio:Google. For the record, I was not in any way insinuating you to advocate including the genitive in the actual naming of the article.--Ioshus Rocchio 06:18, 14 Martii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De Vicipaedia Latina

Salve Adamas,

Scribere volo relationem de Vicipaedia latina (pro commentario periodico nomine "vox latina"). Mihi gaudio est, si alias quaestiones respondere vis:

1) Quid est Vicipaedia?
2) Quomodo Vicipaedia differt ab lexicis aliis?
3) Quomodo Vicipaedia latina differt ab Vicipaediis aliarum linguarum?
4) a) Quomodo lemmata cum argumento falso vel ficto scripta prohiberi possunt? b) Quomodo lemmata in falsa lingua latina scripta prohiberi possunt?
5) Quam utilitatem Vicipaedia mihi dat?
6) Quas alias paginas latinas in interrete commendare potes?
7) Ullam quaestionem desideras? Aliquas annotationes facere vis?

Gratias tibi ago pro labore tuo, --Lupambulus 16:50, 15 Septembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salve! Dice mihi, quaeso te, quod verbum Latinum pro blog est? Gratias ago! --78.0.107.108 13:50, 29 Augusti 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Hi, I've renamed you. Adam Episcopus 02:24, 8 Septembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias tibi! :) Thanks! -Silence 16:54, 8 Septembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Silence. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Silence~lawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:15, 18 Martii 2015 (UTC)

Nomen novum tributum est

Si hoc novum nomen tuum est, potes pristino nomine uti ut certior melius fias. Si novum nomen tibi non placet, potes tuum deligere. Utere hoc situ: Specialis:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

09:24, 19 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)