Disputatio Formulae:Opera Shakesperii

Scriptores scaenici Renascentiae Anglici[fontem recensere]

Does it make sense to have this sub-box on the pages about individual plays? I'm not sure, for example, that someone reading Romeo and Juliet would need a link to Christophorus Marlovius. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:23, 24 Iulii 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could well be right, especially since our navboxes are always open on hand-held screens, thus taking up a lot of page space. Are you interested enough to unpick this structure? Feel free to do so as far as I'm concerned!

I now sometimes include a small link, on the bottom line of a navbox, to a related navbox. That would be a less assertive way to achieve a similar thing, if it's worth linking them at all. See Formula:Continentes for an example: the parameter "sub2" produces the words Capsae cognatae. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:50, 24 Iulii 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I added a sub2 link to Formula:Shakesperii tituli. Let me know what you think! Lesgles (disputatio) 18:38, 25 Iulii 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:06, 25 Iulii 2017 (UTC)[reply]