Disputatio Formulae:NexInt
Nexus interni erratum est! Vide etiam formula iusta!--Nuada (disputatio) 16:51, 30 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
- Alii hanc, alii illam formulam malunt. Qui in Taberna nuper disputabant paene omnes verba "nexus interni" praetulerunt, quae similia sunt verba "nexus externi." Debuimus eligere; hanc formam eligimus. Nescio an "gadget" creari possit, ut lectores formas varias videant -- egomet certe talem rem facere nequeo. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 19:26, 30 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
- Quidam ibi opinati sunt verba "Vide etiam" enumerationem in casu accusativo necessitare ... aliis dissentientibus. Verba "Nexus interni" hanc difficultatem non praebent: ergo simplicius applicantur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 31 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
- Velim addere: "Vide etiam" videtur partem paginae quae semper manebit, id quod non volumus. "Nexus interni" autem magis manifeste tibicen est; malumus nexus in pagina mittere. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 15:49, 31 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
- Quidam ibi opinati sunt verba "Vide etiam" enumerationem in casu accusativo necessitare ... aliis dissentientibus. Verba "Nexus interni" hanc difficultatem non praebent: ergo simplicius applicantur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 31 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
No edit section possibility[fontem recensere]
The usage of this template as it currently is doesn't allow for the possibility of its specific "section" editing. - Klein Muçi (disputatio) 00:29, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- This quirk has never been a bother to me. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:08, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- That's true. It can be edited by opening the preceding section for editing, or by opening the whole page. But if you can make it possible to open the NexInt section alone for editing, that would be perfect. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:35, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- @Andrew Dalby, I'll give it a try. - Klein Muçi (disputatio) 22:28, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- @Andrew Dalby, the closest I could do was this (press Edit to see the code) which let you have an edit possibility BUT if you pressed it it gave you the option to edit the template itself, not the part where it was used. (As described here.) I returned it to the original form. - Klein Muçi (disputatio) 22:51, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for experimenting with this, @Klein Muçi. That was bad luck. I agree, it was better to return the template to its original form. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:48, 9 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- @Andrew Dalby, the closest I could do was this (press Edit to see the code) which let you have an edit possibility BUT if you pressed it it gave you the option to edit the template itself, not the part where it was used. (As described here.) I returned it to the original form. - Klein Muçi (disputatio) 22:51, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- @Andrew Dalby, I'll give it a try. - Klein Muçi (disputatio) 22:28, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)