Disputatio:Smith's English-Latin Dictionary

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Does this Latin title have any authority? I dont' see it in my copy of the dictionary, and surely Lexicon is a more obvious translation for "dictionary" than thesaurus? --Iustinus 15:54, 21 Augusti 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article write tell about http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-dgra/ ? --Roland (disp.) 09:23, 31 Octobris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps. But I wrote the article about the paperback edition which you can buy (at 90 Pounds). --Alex1011 09:44, 31 Octobris 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe these are the same books, no. --Iustinus 17:26, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the title doesn't have authority, should the article be moved to Smith's English-Latin Dictionary? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:16, 22 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it might be useful to mention that at American conventicula many Latin speakers jocularly call it Ludovicus et Brevis. Of course the only written source I can find for this is [1], and two wikipedia talk pages, in my own writing: disputatio:Masturbatio#Etymologia, Disputatio:Sanctus Ioannes. --Iustinus 19:31, 22 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]