Disputatio:Notre-Dame de Paris (Hugo)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

"anno Domini"[fontem recensere]

The two "anno Domini" at the beginning of the article seem not only very non-standard (the norm here on Latin Wikipedia is "p.C.n."), but in this case, where it refers to relatively recent events, even entirely superfluous. I will not risk, however, offending someone by removing them. Toddcs (disputatio) 14:29, 21 Octobris 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The principal author was an anonymous editor, unfamiliar with Vicipaedia's stylistic norms, who added only that article more than a year ago and hasn't been seen since; no reason therefore to worry about offense. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:15, 21 Octobris 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to have made that change and other changes, particularly adding the formula for Augenda. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:10, 21 Octobris 2023 (UTC)[reply]