Disputatio:Nomina Latina e lingua Arabica mutuata

De nexibus intervici[fontem recensere]

As far as I know there are no corresponding articles in the other Wikipedias. The English and Arabic wikipedias have articles on English loans from Arabic, and many other Wikipedias have articles on loans from Arabic in their own languages. No other wikipedia has an article on Arabic loans in (Medieval) Latin. --Fabullus 11:34, 13 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus ad paginas correspondentes Anglicas[fontem recensere]

In the table I have added a column with corresponding English pages because we still have so many red links in Latin. In time the English column could perhaps be removed. --Fabullus 11:34, 13 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Latinitas huius paginae tituli.[fontem recensere]

Nonne "mutuari" verbum deponens est? Estne scribendum "Nomina Latina quae e lingua Arabica mutuati sumus"? --81.141.7.153 11:40, 30 Iunii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recte dicis, sed nonnumquam participia perfecti verborum deponentium adhibentur sensu passivo. Vide quod Lewis & Short scribunt de verbo mutuor. --Fabullus 12:08, 30 Iunii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adhuc includenda[fontem recensere]

(Piper) cubeba, (Curcuma) zedoaria, Carum carvi, lacca. --Fabullus 11:30, 14 Martii 2010 (UTC)[reply]