Disputatio:Maria Wollstonecraft

Too much English?[fontem recensere]

Meta isn't giving Vicipaedia any credit for this article, saying "Wrong language, la:Maria Wollstonecraft has too much untranslated English." But the untranslated English mostly happens to be the titles of her works. So apparently, the article would qualify for inclusion in the 10,000 list, and Vicipaedia would gain 2 points, if only we blanked out the titles of her books or put Latin glosses in their place! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:57, 18 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just now, I've tried the expedient of hiding English titles inside links; next month, we may learn whether that workaround was successful. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:40, 19 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also (while we're at it), Meta says Vicipaedia has no article for "Egg," but it does: "Ovum." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:06, 18 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also "Insular Oceania," but that's the same as "Oceania." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:14, 18 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Vicipaedia's "Malum Sinense" isn't being recognized as referring to "Orange" (the fruit). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:18, 18 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably other such discrepancies can be found. Who will fix them? To see Meta's list of egregiously missing articles go here. The significance of the order by which the titles are numbered is a mystery. (Copied to Taberna.) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:18, 18 Iulii 2021 (UTC)[reply]