Disputatio:Food in the Ancient World from A to Z

Ista pagina mihi valde displicet, adeo ut delendam censeam. Contributiones Andreae Dalby ipsae optimae quidem sunt, haec autem mera adhortatio est aut ad emendum aut ad legendum aliquem contributoris librum. Eiusmodi libri ad paragraphos de fontibus paginis nostris additos referendi sunt. Scribat, siquis velit, paginam de alimentis veterum, ut iste liber inter fontes de hac re repetendos citari possit!--Irenaeus 09:32, 13 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haec pagina utrum exstare debeat necne nihil opinor, sed scito Rolandum paginam non quasi adhortationem creasse, sed potius quod liber iamiam citatus est nonnullis commentationibus. --Iustinus 23:14, 13 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't looked at the page, or the disputatio, till now. I must admit I rather agree with Irenaeus! The book has as yet had only one review that I'm aware of, so it doesn't meet the usual standard of notability. Of course, I'm happy for it to be mined as a source for Vicipaedia, and that is quite sufficiently repaid by citations in relevant articles. I won't comment further: if the article is deleted, fine; if it's better for it to stay (for the reason that Rolandus originally wrote it) I (or someone else) could make it slightly more substantial by adding a couple of details about the book and a citation of the review. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:07, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is still here I am adding one or two details and references. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:39, 8 Maii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was all very well, but honestly the book isn't notable in Vicipaedia terms, so I have merged the page into Andreas Dalby. Whether he is notable, others can decide! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:28, 8 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)[reply]