Disputatio:Eugenius Victor Debs

Internationale Collegium Opificum?[fontem recensere]

What is this? Is it translated from the "International Labor Union" mentioned on en:wiki? If so, that name has no link on en:wiki, so I wonder if there is some mistake? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:09, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does it refer to the "Wobblies"? (The Industrial Workers of the World.) IacobusAmor 15:54, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't seem to: they are named separately on the page, as "Industriales Opifices Orbis Terrarum". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:00, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is industrialis, -e a word? Classical Latin already had industrius, -a, -um. Since o. mundi is already attested by Cicero, would Industrii/Industriales Mundi Opifices work? IacobusAmor 17:11, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When referring to the IWW, other Wikis tend to use the English name. I suggest we do the same. Of course, this doesn't help the category problem. --Neander 00:11, 25 Februarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quid est...[fontem recensere]

...dux conversionis? --Alex1011 19:05, 2 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vult dicere ut videtur "American union leader," sed tecum puto non esse rectum. IacobusAmor 19:38, 2 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]