Disputatio:Cinerella

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

Habemus hanc historiam Latine? "Cinderella" est nomen Anglicum. Nescio quo nomine debemus uti in lingua Latina. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:58, 31 Octobris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cinerella Victor Barocas. Fabulae Mirabiles. Pro Scientia. Hippocrene Books, NY. 2000.
also
Tres porcelli
Tibicen Versicolor
Rumpelstiltskin
Lacernella Rubra
Rapunzella
Nostrae Vestes Imperatoris
Iax et Fabae Magicae
Nivea et Septem Homunculi
Auricoma et Tres Ursi
Hansellus et Gretella
Bella Dormiens
--Ioscius (disp) 13:32, 31 Octobris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is so funny. I actually just thought of writing an article about Cinderella as I was driving back home today. Another name I came up with for Cinderella in Latin is "Cinerentola", from the Italian "Cenerentola". Does anyone on Vicipaedia have a preference for "Cenerentola" or "Cinerella"? -Kedemus 07:19, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cinerentola is nice, but we have to prefer Cinerella for our title because this is the form that already exists in print in Latin: see Ioscius's citation of the Victor Barocas book above. Evidently Barocas based his choice on the Latin word cinera "ashes", which was quite reasonable. But once you've published a Latin version of the story with Cinerentola as main character, we can consider changing!! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:18, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Latin word for ash is actually "cinis, cineris". The Italian "Cenerentola" comes from its word for ash- cenera (I think). But let's see what others have to say. We cannot decide for certain that we want to Latinize a name a certain way based on only one rendering of the name as such. -Kedemus 19:48, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is an attestation, Kedeme, that's what we go for around here. See my comments at Disputatio:Iax et Fabae Magicae...--Ioscius (disp) 00:39, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discipula Latina sum. Veniam vestram peto ut hanc paginam lente scribam. Erit auxilio mihi in Latina discenda. Gratias vobis ago. -- [Anon]

Anon: Quis es? IacobusAmor 14:02, 1 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Est Analeigh. Nomen omisi in paginis contribuendis ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:03, 1 Novembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]