Disputatio:Ars rhetorica

Nomen commentarii[fontem recensere]

Why isn't the title of this article merely Rhetorica or Rhetorice? For English 'rhetoric', Cassell's gives "rhetorica, rhetorice (Quint.), ars dicendi, bene dicendi scientia (Quint.)"—but not ars rhetorica. IacobusAmor 19:16, 3 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ars rhetorica seems OK, pace Cassell. It is the usual Latin title for Aristotle's work on the subject, and also the title of a current journal about rhetoric. It gets nearly 20,000 Google hits. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 4 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All the more reason to accommodate rhetoric in an article Rhetorica and leave Aristotle and the journal to their own devices! Entia sicut paginae distinguentes non sunt multiplicanda! IacobusAmor 14:41, 4 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)[reply]