Disputatio:Anonymus Neveleti

Images

I added two. The first (of Nevelet's title page) is less relevant, and could well deserve to be replaced by an image from one of the manuscripts or earlier editions. The bibliography, also, is merely a start, recording the one edition I looked at. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:18, 14 Septembris 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, that looks good. BTW, I decided to go with this title rather than enwiki's "Gualterus Anglicus" because of the doubts stated on that page (and in the ARLIMA link), but if anyone wants to investigate and write more on the subject, please do. In the meantime, I'll keep making my way through the missing Latin Library authors. Lesgles (disputatio) 15:43, 14 Septembris 2020 (UTC)

I think you're right. In a similar case I would prefer a title if possible (because the article will be about a book, not a ghostly person) but there really doesn't seem to be a usable title for this text! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:06, 15 Septembris 2020 (UTC)