Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Laocoon" differant

← Differentia superior Differentia proxima →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Emendatio ex 18:24, 27 Maii 2008

Laocoön or Laocoon? Harrissimo 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Good question. Since oo in Latin can only be treated as two vowels (unlike oe, which can either be a diphthong or two separate vowels) I don't see any reason to put a diaeresis on it. But others might disagree ... Andrew Dalby 18:15, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is an unpublished rule on diaereses (Disputatio Vicipaediae:De orthographia#Diaereses) which is that we should use them. So if we do accept UV's argument about the Gadgets changing poesis to pœsis when ligaturae monstrantur, as well the argument that aeris/aëris need distinguishing, do we need to keep consistency in this case? Should that rule be published? Harrissimo 18:24, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Linea 1: / Linea 1: @@
 Laocoön or Laocoon? <font face="Courier New" size="4">[[Disputatio Usoris:Harrissimo|Harrissimo]]</font> 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).
 :Good question. Since ''oo'' in Latin can only be treated as two vowels (unlike ''oe'', which can either be a diphthong or two separate vowels) I don't see any reason to put a diaeresis on it. But others might disagree ... <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 18:15, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC)
+::There is an unpublished rule on diaereses ([[Disputatio Vicipaediae:De orthographia#Diaereses]]) which is that we should use them. So if we do accept UV's argument about the Gadgets changing poesis to ''pœsis'' when ''ligaturae monstrantur'', as well the argument that ''aeris/aëris'' need distinguishing, do we need to keep consistency in this case? Should that rule be published? <font face="Courier New" size="4">[[Disputatio Usoris:Harrissimo|Harrissimo]]</font> 18:24, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).