Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Laocoon" differant

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Emendatio ex 18:15, 27 Maii 2008

Laocoön or Laocoon? Harrissimo 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Good question. Since oo in Latin can only be treated as two vowels (unlike oe, which can either be a diphthong or two separate vowels) I don't see any reason to put a diaeresis on it. But others might disagree ... Andrew Dalby 18:15, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emendatio ex 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 recensere Harrissimo (disputatio \| conlationes) 6 634 edits Nova pagina: Laocoön or Laocoon? ~~~~.		Emendatio ex 18:15, 27 Maii 2008 recensere abrogare Andrew Dalby (disputatio \| conlationes) Grapheocrates, Magistratus 315 919 edits No edit summary Differentia proxima →
Linea 1:		Linea 1:
	Laocoön or Laocoon? <font face="Courier New" size="4">[[Disputatio Usoris:Harrissimo\|Harrissimo]]</font> 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).		Laocoön or Laocoon? <font face="Courier New" size="4">[[Disputatio Usoris:Harrissimo\|Harrissimo]]</font> 17:56, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC).
			:Good question. Since ''oo'' in Latin can only be treated as two vowels (unlike ''oe'', which can either be a diphthong or two separate vowels) I don't see any reason to put a diaeresis on it. But others might disagree ... <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby\|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby\| Dalby]]</font></font> 18:15, 27 Maii 2008 (UTC)