Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lava" differant

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Redactio novissime (die 14 Octobris 2019, hora 01:46) facta

Citations[fontem recensere]

I just restored the lemma rhyax, which an anonymous editor deleted without explanation—oddly, they left the citation intact. While I'm at it, though, is there any reason for Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok to get its own footnote, rather than being listed as a third entry in the first one (after Serao and Egger)? --Iustinus (disputatio) 01:46, 14 Octobris 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emendatio ex 01:46, 14 Octobris 2019 recensere Iustinus (disputatio \| conlationes) Magistratus 8 969 edits Paginam instituit, scribens '== Citations === I just restored the lemma '''rhyax''', which an anonymous editor deleted without explanation—oddly, they left the citation intact. While I'm at it...'		Redactio novissime (die 14 Octobris 2019, hora 01:46) facta recensere abrogare Iustinus (disputatio \| conlationes) Magistratus 8 969 edits m →‎Citations =
Linea 1:		Linea 1:
	== Citations ===		== Citations ==
	I just restored the lemma '''rhyax''', which an anonymous editor deleted without explanation—oddly, they left the citation intact. While I'm at it, though, is there any reason for ''Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok'' to get its own footnote, rather than being listed as a third entry in the first one (after Serao and Egger)? --[[Usor:Iustinus\|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus\|disputatio]]) 01:46, 14 Octobris 2019 (UTC)		I just restored the lemma '''rhyax''', which an anonymous editor deleted without explanation—oddly, they left the citation intact. While I'm at it, though, is there any reason for ''Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok'' to get its own footnote, rather than being listed as a third entry in the first one (after Serao and Egger)? --[[Usor:Iustinus\|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus\|disputatio]]) 01:46, 14 Octobris 2019 (UTC)