Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Hembecca superior et inferior" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Linea 3: | Linea 3: | ||
: Et ego ita censeo. [[Usor:Neander|Neander]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Neander|disputatio]]) 11:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
: Et ego ita censeo. [[Usor:Neander|Neander]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Neander|disputatio]]) 11:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
||
::I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for ''Hembecca'', and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
::I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for ''Hembecca'', and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
||
::: Yes I found sources for Hembeke so I have choose this one but I have seen hembecca in this https://quartier-noh.be/heembeek-mutsaard-patrimoine/ I have only mentionned it. But if there is a source there are no problem to change the title but the I think that the two has to be mentionned in the article. Thank you. --[[Usor:Huguespotter|Huguespotter]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Huguespotter|disputatio]]) 15:24, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
::: Yes I found sources for Hembeke so I have choose this one but I have seen hembecca in this https://quartier-noh.be/heembeek-mutsaard-patrimoine/, so I have only mentionned it. But if there is a source there are no problem to change the title but the I think that the two has to be mentionned in the article. Thank you. --[[Usor:Huguespotter|Huguespotter]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Huguespotter|disputatio]]) 15:24, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC) |
||
Emendatio ex 15:25, 13 Iunii 2019
De titulo
Quid dicitis, o amici, de nomine "Hembecca superior et inferior"? Et "Hembecca" et "Heembeke" sicut nomina Latina in fontibus video, sed "Hembecca -am -ae", declinatione prima, facilius Latine usitatur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:40, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- Et ego ita censeo. Neander (disputatio) 11:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for Hembecca, and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. Sigur (disputatio) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- Yes I found sources for Hembeke so I have choose this one but I have seen hembecca in this https://quartier-noh.be/heembeek-mutsaard-patrimoine/, so I have only mentionned it. But if there is a source there are no problem to change the title but the I think that the two has to be mentionned in the article. Thank you. --Huguespotter (disputatio) 15:24, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for Hembecca, and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. Sigur (disputatio) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)