Disputatio Vicipaediae:Paginae quas omnibus Wikipediis contineri oportet/Expansio/Anthropologia et psychologia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

Under Artes athleticae, Vicipaedia's article Piscatus, which probably corresponds to en:Angling and de:Angeln (Fischfang), isn't listed—but it's a mess, not even a stipula. Still, it'd be worth 0.002 points if the list would like to acknowledge its existence. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:26, 17 Augusti 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wait! It's in "Vicipaedia:Porta eruditionis/Scriptorium/" so presumably it doesn't exist? Is there a reason that, after all these years (the author hasn't touched it since 10 Iunii 2008‎), it shouldn't be deleted or fixed and moved to the "regular" encyclopedia? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:29, 17 Augusti 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No reason. By all means move it and improve it if you want. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:19, 17 Augusti 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are two or three pages listed under "Scriptorium," I believe, which should probably be cleared up. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 12:20, 24 Augusti 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is en:Hope not equivalent to la:Spes? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:20, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're not attached to the same Wikidata item. In fact, as far as I can see, Spes doesn't have a Wikidata entry at all. But it does have an explicit link to the English page. Eventually, I believe, a bot will come around and fix that -- or at least this used to happen; since our page hasn't been touched in a year, perhaps the bot no longer thinks it has to run. The right solution is to go to en:Hope, thence to Wikidata (follow the link under "Tools"), add our page to the Wikidata item, and remove the explicit link in the source of our page. Remember, the 1000 and 10,000 page lists at Meta go by Wikidata items only, not by page names! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:37, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Too complicated to do today, but I've gone to en: and added a link to :la at the bottom of the text. Maybe that will alert the appropriate authorities! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:42, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't count on it, but it can't hurt. Eventually it's worth getting comfortable with Wikidata; there will presumably be a bit more time once the semester settles into a routine. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:44, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikidata method I've found to be easiest is simply to add the Wikidata links from our page here. You create the page, then click on "add links" on the sidebar under Linguis aliis, then enter the language code and the name of the corresponding article. You have to be logged into Wikidata.org to do this, but once you are, it only takes a few seconds for each page. If there is an explicit link in the page, you have to remove it first for the "add links" option to show up. Lesgles (disputatio) 21:39, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lingua Tagalog[fontem recensere]

I've just added this article, which I could have added two days ago but was thrown off by the subtleties involved. Vicipaedia already had lingua Philippinica, which seemed to claim to be the same as Tagalog, but investigation shows that the lingua Philippinica is the national register of the lingua Tagalog. So now I've fixed your page appropriately but don't know how fast the rest of the system will catch on. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:49, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anthropologia biologica[fontem recensere]

The update missed anthropologia biologica, a link to which didn't automatically get added to the English Wikipedia, so I've added it there by hand. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 18:11, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Language links in pages don't do any good: all of this goes by Wikidata. Language links in pages do affect the "linguis aliis" list in the sidebar, but they don't affect the scores calculated in Meta or the scores I calculate here. So it's not worth bothering to add those: none of the utilities can see them. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:12, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. Mental note: "not worth bothering." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:54, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The latest update seems to have missed our article on Yue. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 01:23, 12 Februarii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the usual reason: our page isn't listed in Wikidata. That's what I look at to populate these pages, and that's what the statistics/standings programs in Meta use as well. Old-fashioned inter-wiki links don't count. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 14:20, 12 Februarii 2016 (UTC)[reply]