Vicipaedia:Imagines in disputatione

Some images in the Latin Wikipedia have been discussed or are in discussion. The questions with an image mostly are:

Shall we include it?
Shall we hide it, using our {{monstrare}} template?
Is it offending?
etc.

Activitates eroticae[fontem recensere]

Carracci Le Satyre et la Nymphe.jpg[fontem recensere]

http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Activitates_eroticae&diff=next&oldid=181607
http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Activitates_eroticae&diff=next&oldid=190555
http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Activitates_eroticae&curid=10219&diff=191029&oldid=190719
http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disputatio:Activitates_eroticae&curid=25137&diff=191030&oldid=190716
Hiding this illustration is ridiculous. --Rolandus 18:50, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I disagree. Just because it is illustrated doesn't mean that the content should be displayed. It isn't "tame" as Iacobus put it. Alexanderr 18:53, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consentio Rolando: ridiculous.--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:22, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Et consentio Iacobo: tame.--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:23, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disputatio:Actus_Sexuales#template

Pornographia[fontem recensere]

Carracci Jupiter et Junon.jpg[fontem recensere]

Disputatio:Pornographia

Homophylophilia[fontem recensere]

Hyakinthos.jpg[fontem recensere]

Disputatio:Homophylophilia#.22Hadrianus_Augustus_et_Antinous.22

Eiaculatum[fontem recensere]

Semen2.jpg[fontem recensere]

http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eiaculatum&diff=181616&oldid=181571

Ars vivendi[fontem recensere]

Michelangelo Caravaggio 007.jpg[fontem recensere]

Has not been discussed yet ...

What, in all creation, could be offensive about this image? IacobusAmor 14:42, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I forgot the smiley, when I listed this image here. ;-) After all: This man is half naked and he is drinking a red liquid which might be wine. --Rolandus 15:08, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ha! He's only 23.6 percent naked. If you go to a respectable public beach on any continent, you'll see men 95.7 percent naked. The Bible and the Koran favorably mention wine. Bacchus seems to be wearing wearing fruits. Could that be what's objectionable? IacobusAmor 19:27, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Silly, they favorably mention grape juice. But yes, you are right, everyone knows that God Hates Fruits. --Iustinus 17:25, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Of course! How could I have missed that! ¶ Regarding ancient wine: there's almost no proposition so stupid that people won't trick themselves into believing. IacobusAmor 17:36, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]