Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Roma condita" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Linea 1: | Linea 1: | ||
Delenda. In total unself-consciousness, it presents myth as fact. Compare the exordium of the articles cognate in other wikis and you'll see the difference at once. + A better title: Roma condita? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 00:47, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC) |
Delenda. In total unself-consciousness, it presents myth as fact. Compare the exordium of the articles cognate in other wikis and you'll see the difference at once. + A better title: Roma condita? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 00:47, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I agree. A plagiary ''more Drengurio''. --[[Usor:Neander|Neander]] 02:45, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC) |
: I agree. A plagiary ''more Drengurio''. --[[Usor:Neander|Neander]] 02:45, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC) |
||
::100% in agreement. This thing has gotta move and get fully and completely overhauled. [[Usor:CeleritasSoni|CeleritasSoni]] 03:36, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Emendatio ex 03:36, 2 Decembris 2009
Delenda. In total unself-consciousness, it presents myth as fact. Compare the exordium of the articles cognate in other wikis and you'll see the difference at once. + A better title: Roma condita? IacobusAmor 00:47, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. A plagiary more Drengurio. --Neander 02:45, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC)
- 100% in agreement. This thing has gotta move and get fully and completely overhauled. CeleritasSoni 03:36, 2 Decembris 2009 (UTC)