Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:In girum imus nocte ecce et consumimur igni" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Linea 3: | Linea 3: | ||
:Not extremely vulgar, simply vulgar, like most of us humans most of the time! |
:Not extremely vulgar, simply vulgar, like most of us humans most of the time! |
||
:I think you were right to question this claim. I have removed the sentence. Anyone could put it back again with a precise reference. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 08:26, 4 Maii 2020 (UTC) |
:I think you were right to question this claim. I have removed the sentence. Anyone could put it back again with a precise reference. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 08:26, 4 Maii 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Categoriam "Aenigmata" addidi, quia neque papiliones neque daemones sine cogitatione |
::Categoriam "Aenigmata" addidi, quia neque papiliones neque daemones sine cogitatione in mentem veniunt! [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 08:52, 4 Maii 2020 (UTC) |
||
Emendatio ex 08:52, 4 Maii 2020
Sorry for writing in extremely vulgar language ... I am just interested by finding where in Nomen Rosae we can find this palindrome? Couldn't find it in my French epub version of the book
- Not extremely vulgar, simply vulgar, like most of us humans most of the time!
- I think you were right to question this claim. I have removed the sentence. Anyone could put it back again with a precise reference. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:26, 4 Maii 2020 (UTC)
- Categoriam "Aenigmata" addidi, quia neque papiliones neque daemones sine cogitatione in mentem veniunt! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:52, 4 Maii 2020 (UTC)