Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Archaeodontosaurus" differant
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Linea 4: | Linea 4: | ||
: Oops, indeed it is a mistake of referral, I will look in Swedish what they received. --[[Usor:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Archaeodontosaurus|disputatio]]) 12:37, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
: Oops, indeed it is a mistake of referral, I will look in Swedish what they received. --[[Usor:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Archaeodontosaurus|disputatio]]) 12:37, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks for your reply. The caption was no problem -- mistakes like that happen often! I just wanted to say that for a very brief article, three additional images was too many: hence I kept the most relevant one. The others could be added again when the article is longer. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 14:27, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
::Thanks for your reply. The caption was no problem -- mistakes like that happen often! I just wanted to say that for a very brief article, three additional images was too many: hence I kept the most relevant one. The others could be added again when the article is longer. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 14:27, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
||
:::I understand very well, I propose a pack and each country chosen, to illustrate as it sees fit. --[[Usor:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Archaeodontosaurus|disputatio]]) 17:02, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
:::I understand very well, I propose a pack and each country chosen, to illustrate as it sees fit. Merci pour votre agréable accueil --[[Usor:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Archaeodontosaurus|disputatio]]) 17:02, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC) |
||
Redactio novissime (die 7 Martii 2019, hora 17:03) facta
Salve, Archaeodontosaure!
Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.
Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
ca, 
de, 
en, 
es, 
ia, 
it, 
ru, 
ro, 
no, 
tl, 
eo) - De orthographia (
ca, en, 
es, 
tl) - Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
- Taberna
- Lexica Neolatina
- Lexica Latina interretialia
- Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
- Fontes nominum geographicorum
- Index formularum
Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.
In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!
E tribus imaginibus, quas in paginam Gregorius Barbaricus addidisti, unam retinui rubricamque (Suedicam?) Latine converti. Certe licebit alias restituere, sed necesse erit textum longiorem scribere: Vicipaedia enim (dicitur) "non est pinacotheca". Gratias ago propter collaborationem tuam! Salve optime Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:32, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC)
- Oops, indeed it is a mistake of referral, I will look in Swedish what they received. --Archaeodontosaurus (disputatio) 12:37, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. The caption was no problem -- mistakes like that happen often! I just wanted to say that for a very brief article, three additional images was too many: hence I kept the most relevant one. The others could be added again when the article is longer. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:27, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC)
- I understand very well, I propose a pack and each country chosen, to illustrate as it sees fit. Merci pour votre agréable accueil --Archaeodontosaurus (disputatio) 17:02, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. The caption was no problem -- mistakes like that happen often! I just wanted to say that for a very brief article, three additional images was too many: hence I kept the most relevant one. The others could be added again when the article is longer. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:27, 7 Martii 2019 (UTC)