Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Ssolbergj" differant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia
Content deleted Content added
Linea 42: Linea 42:
I reverted your move of the infobox from left to right. I chose left intentionally because, this way, the box can be placed immediately on any page without disturbing the arrangement of images, which usually appear on the right. There is a discussion about these infoboxes at [[Disputatio Usoris:UV]]: please join in if you wish. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 15:47, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
I reverted your move of the infobox from left to right. I chose left intentionally because, this way, the box can be placed immediately on any page without disturbing the arrangement of images, which usually appear on the right. There is a discussion about these infoboxes at [[Disputatio Usoris:UV]]: please join in if you wish. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 15:47, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
:But when the new capsa is inserted, shouldn't a duplicate image be deleted? As in, e.g., [[Carolina Gulielma Sandell-Berg]]. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 16:07, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
:But when the new capsa is inserted, shouldn't a duplicate image be deleted? As in, e.g., [[Carolina Gulielma Sandell-Berg]]. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 16:07, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
::See the discussion at [[Disputatio Usoris:UV]]. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 20:43, 24 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Emendatio ex 20:43, 24 Februarii 2015

Salve, Ssolbergj!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

-- Andrew Dalby 22:04, 3 Decembris 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vexilloid?

Greetings. You might want to comment at Disputatio:Imperium Romanum, Ssolbergj! Andrew Dalby 10:34, 25 Novembris 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (a little late) for your reply to that question, and thanks also for all the work you are now doing on portals etc. You are evidently just what we needed! Andrew Dalby 22:04, 3 Decembris 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula:Monstrare

Thanks

Hi, Ssolbergj. Thanks very much for all your work on the new front page. It's a great improvement! Andrew Dalby 14:09, 11 Augusti 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) - Ssolbergj (disputatio) 13:21, 1 Septembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice picture, too. I like Alma-Tadema! Andrew Dalby 13:43, 1 Septembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Salve Ssolbergj. :) Etiam ego dicere. Antea te gratiabam sed fortasse non videbas, ita causae certae, gratias tibi ago paginae primae novae. :) Probo pyxides qua graves res simplicitate advenire possumus. -- Donatello (disputatio) 02:23, 23 Septembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Gratias

Gratias tibi ago formulae novae Interretis. :) Bene est hanc habere. -- Donatello (disputatio) 02:07, 23 Septembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]


I like the heraldry

I like your addition to Europa and your heraldic formula. Personally I'm an antinationalist, but, if nations must exist, it's very nice for Vicipaedia to symbolize them with little shields rather than little flags.

Long ago I learned the special language for describing "blazons" in English. I'm now learning how to do it in Latin, so perhaps I will sometimes add a description in the correct format to a page about coats of arms, as I did at Insigne Germaniae. Andrew Dalby 10:21, 30 Octobris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

100,000

I think you created a new version of the Vicipaedia logo for this occasion, didn't you? But where is it? Do you know how to put it up there in the top left corner?? Andrew Dalby 15:09, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, I see it now. I just needed to clear my cache. No problem Andrew Dalby 15:18, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted ...

... your move of Sacrum Romanum Imperium. First, because the name we had is supported by the footnotes following it; second, because it was agreed after discussion on the talk page. My impression (supported by the sources already cited, though there might be other evidence against!) is that "Sacrum Romanum Imperium" is the usual name and the usual word order ... but certainly feel free to discuss it on the talk page. Andrew Dalby 16:11, 17 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fact, incidentally, that in modern Latin names of this kind an honorary adjective (such as "sacer" or "regalis" or "pontificius") often comes first, then the noun, and then a more meaningful adjective last. Thus, based on similar examples, I would have expected "Sacrum Imperium Romanum", and there may be sources supporting that -- I haven't looked. Andrew Dalby 16:20, 17 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that I think your changes to our names of political parties are a very good thing, exactly what was needed :) Andrew Dalby 12:15, 18 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Series" is good. Andrew Dalby 17:14, 24 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How many mugshots?

I notice that you sometimes reduce the number of pictures at "Nuntii" on the pagina prima to one. We others who add news to this section gradually add another one or two, and the cycle starts again. If you explain why you want only one picture, maybe others would agree with you :) At present, I know of no reason. Andrew Dalby 08:56, 24 Septembris 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Capsa Wikidata

I reverted your move of the infobox from left to right. I chose left intentionally because, this way, the box can be placed immediately on any page without disturbing the arrangement of images, which usually appear on the right. There is a discussion about these infoboxes at Disputatio Usoris:UV: please join in if you wish. Andrew Dalby 15:47, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But when the new capsa is inserted, shouldn't a duplicate image be deleted? As in, e.g., Carolina Gulielma Sandell-Berg. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:07, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See the discussion at Disputatio Usoris:UV. Andrew Dalby 20:43, 24 Februarii 2015 (UTC)[reply]