Quantum redactiones paginae "Reiectio socialis" differant

← Differentia superior Differentia proxima →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Emendatio ex 15:37, 1 Maii 2013

Reiectio Socialis ^[1] accidit cum homo de industria excluditur ex affinitate socialis aut immiscendo socialis cuius materia reiectiones aemulis^[2] amantibusque^[3] includit. Homo reiectari potest in sensu singulo an grege integro. Etiam reiectio esse potest activa per grassandum an ridendum aut passiva per ignorandum aut adhibendum nefandi. Experientia reiectandi est interpretatio subiecta accipienti et percipi potest quamquam non vero adest. Quamvis homines entes socialis sunt, fieri non potest quin quidam gradu reiectionis sit sicut pars vitae, deinde discendum aestimationis sui vel depressio parere potest. Tamen, reiectio molestia^[4] ^[5]esse potest cum extenditur aut constat.

Fontes

↑ (Anglice)Williams, Kipling D.; Joseph P. Forgas, William von Hippel (2005). The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. Psychology Press. p. 366 pages. ISBN 184169424X
↑ (Anglice)Cillessen, A., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
↑ Baumeister, R. F. & Dhavale, D. (2001).Two sides of romantic rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. (pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
↑ (Anglice)McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., & Mercer, L. (2001). The consequences of childhood rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. (pp. 213-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
↑ (Anglice)Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., & Smith, L. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202-214.

Lectiones

Asher, S. R., & Coie, J. D. (1990). Peer rejection in childhood.(Anglice) Cambridge University Press.
Bierman, K. L. (2003). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies.(Anglice) New York: The Guilford Press.
Leary, M. (2001). Interpersonal rejection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Savage, E. (2002). Don't take it personally: The art of dealing with rejection.(Anglice) Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Williams, K. D., Forgás, J. P., & von Hippel, W. (2005). The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying.(Anglice) New York: Psychology Press.

Nexus Externi

[1] (Anglice)Williams, Kipling D.; Joseph P. Forgas, William von Hippel (2005). The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. Psychology Press. p. 366 pages. ISBN 184169424X

[2] (Anglice)Cillessen, A., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[Baumeister,_R._F._2001_pp._55-72-3] Baumeister, R. F. & Dhavale, D. (2001).Two sides of romantic rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. (pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[McDougall,_P._2001_pp._213-247-4] (Anglice)McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., & Mercer, L. (2001). The consequences of childhood rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. (pp. 213-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[5] (Anglice)Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., & Smith, L. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202-214.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Linea 1: / Linea 1: @@
-[[Fasciculus:Bullying Irfe.jpg|thumb|right|Reiecti liberi sunt proclivi grassandum in scholae, ludi et areae.]]
+[[Fasciculus:Bullying_on_Instituto_Regional_Federico_Errázuriz_(IRFE)_in_March_5,_2007.jpg|thumb|right|Reiecti liberi sunt proclivi grassandum in scholae, ludi et areae.]]
 '''Reiectio Socialis''' <ref>{{cite book | last = (Anglice)Williams | first = Kipling D. | coauthors = Joseph P. Forgas, William von Hippel | title = The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying | publisher = Psychology Press | year = 2005 | isbn = 184169424X | page = 366 pages}}</ref> accidit cum homo de [[exclusio socialis|industria excluditur]] ex affinitate socialis aut immiscendo socialis cuius materia reiectiones aemulis<ref>(Anglice)Cillessen, A., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. (2000). ''Stability of sociometric categories''. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.</ref>  amantibusque<ref name="Baumeister, R. F. 2001 pp. 55-72">Baumeister, R. F. & Dhavale, D. (2001).Two sides of romantic rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), ''Interpersonal rejection''. (pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.</ref> includit. [[homo sapiens|Homo]] reiectari potest in sensu singulo an grege integro. Etiam reiectio esse potest activa per grassandum an ridendum aut passiva per ignorandum aut adhibendum nefandi. Experientia reiectandi est interpretatio subiecta accipienti et percipi potest quamquam non vero adest. Quamvis homines entes socialis sunt, fieri non potest quin quidam gradu reiectionis sit sicut pars vitae, deinde discendum [[aestimatio sui|aestimationis sui]] vel [[depressio (psychiatria)|depressio]] parere potest. Tamen, reiectio molestia<ref name="McDougall, P. 2001 pp. 213-247">(Anglice)McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., & Mercer, L. (2001). The consequences of childhood rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), ''Interpersonal rejection.'' (pp. 213-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.</ref> <ref>(Anglice)Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., & Smith, L. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. ''Aggressive Behavior'', ''29'', 202-214.</ref>esse potest cum extenditur aut constat.
 == Fontes ==