Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Imperium Cossanum" differant
Content deleted Content added
UV (disputatio | conlationes) |
|||
Linea 1: | Linea 1: | ||
{{PagMen|2007|1}} |
{{PagMen|2007|1}} |
||
{{TransHebd}} |
{{TransHebd}} |
||
==error ? == |
|||
Hodiernum congruit cum nomine feminino:--> hodiernam ? |
|||
== Budd(h)ism == |
== Budd(h)ism == |
Redactio novissime (die 3 Martii 2013, hora 23:24) facta
Imperium Cossanum fuit pagina mensis Ianuarii 2007. |
Imperium Cossanum fuit Translatio Hebdomadalis. |
error ?[fontem recensere]
Hodiernum congruit cum nomine feminino:--> hodiernam ?
Budd(h)ism[fontem recensere]
Leaving out the h in Budda and the various derived terms was not arbitrary. The title Βουδδᾶς is in fact repeatedly attested in Christian accounts of Mani/Terebinthus. I have long since given up on the idea of uniformly enforcing this as an attested, and therefor preferred, form: the consensus of Vicipaedia has pretty firmly placed the article on Buddhism s.v. Buddhismus, et ita porro. But I think when we're writing about an ancient empire, with a large Greek population, with so many names attested in Greek forms, or at least Greek letters (including, I hasten to add, ΒΟΔΔΟ), I think it's fair for me to insist on the attested ancient form. --Iustinus 18:36, 1 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)