Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Cavia porcellus" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Linea 4: | Linea 4: | ||
:Possibly they were going for {{lewshort|arista}}s? —[[Usor:Muke|Muke]] 13:40, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
:Possibly they were going for {{lewshort|arista}}s? —[[Usor:Muke|Muke]] 13:40, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Head of grain or something like that. nice! How about acutulior?[[Usor:Jondel|Jondel]] 13:53, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
::Head of grain or something like that. nice! How about acutulior?[[Usor:Jondel|Jondel]] 13:53, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::It just looks like the comparative of {{lewshort|acutulus}}. I'm not sure what they're going for in that sentence, especially with ''ferrae'' (I suspect 'ferae' is meant—but 'wild cavies are a little sharper every day'?). —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius Tever]] 19:16, 7 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==Conception and emendation== |
==Conception and emendation== |
||
| Linea 13: | Linea 14: | ||
::::The taxobox shows it's an animal, and it therefore needs its ordinary Latin name; hence the new lemma. Note that the species epithet, ''porcellus,'' is a masculine noun ('little pig'), which stands in apposition to the genus name, a feminine noun. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 14:06, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
::::The taxobox shows it's an animal, and it therefore needs its ordinary Latin name; hence the new lemma. Note that the species epithet, ''porcellus,'' is a masculine noun ('little pig'), which stands in apposition to the genus name, a feminine noun. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 14:06, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::::Good move, Iacobe! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:39, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
:::::Good move, Iacobe! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:39, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
||
The intro sentence seems to suggest a common name or genus is in mind, not the species ("X is a mammal of the caviid family originating from one or many of the species of the genus ''Cavia''"). It looks like it was written when the page was still at a page that could be about cavies in general, but wasn't rewritten when the page was moved to ''Cavia porcellus'' in particular. (The history doesn't support this hypothesis, though—I can't tell how this sentence came to be at all.) —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius Tever]] 19:16, 7 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Emendatio ex 19:16, 7 Ianuarii 2012
Aristes
What does arites mean? Que significa aristes? Qoud significat aristes? Precious stome? Joya?Gemmane? Acinumne?Jondel 04:52, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Possibly they were going for aristas? —Muke 13:40, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Head of grain or something like that. nice! How about acutulior?Jondel 13:53, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- It just looks like the comparative of acutulus. I'm not sure what they're going for in that sentence, especially with ferrae (I suspect 'ferae' is meant—but 'wild cavies are a little sharper every day'?). —Mucius Tever 19:16, 7 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Head of grain or something like that. nice! How about acutulior?Jondel 13:53, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
Conception and emendation
I didn't conceive this article and am trying to understand a lot of what the author is saying with help from the other language wikis. I hope I will be able to improve this. Your help of course is highly appreciated.Jondel 13:37, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- For one, I wonder why it's at 'cobaia' instead of 'cavia' (influence from Iberian languages, I guess?) —Muke 13:40, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I added "Fontes desiderati" therefore (sorry, I don't have time to do the checking right now). Andrew Dalby 13:45, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Ughh mee toooo. It's late at night in this side of the hemisphere.--Jondel 13:54, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- The taxobox shows it's an animal, and it therefore needs its ordinary Latin name; hence the new lemma. Note that the species epithet, porcellus, is a masculine noun ('little pig'), which stands in apposition to the genus name, a feminine noun. IacobusAmor 14:06, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Good move, Iacobe! Andrew Dalby 14:39, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- The taxobox shows it's an animal, and it therefore needs its ordinary Latin name; hence the new lemma. Note that the species epithet, porcellus, is a masculine noun ('little pig'), which stands in apposition to the genus name, a feminine noun. IacobusAmor 14:06, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Ughh mee toooo. It's late at night in this side of the hemisphere.--Jondel 13:54, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I added "Fontes desiderati" therefore (sorry, I don't have time to do the checking right now). Andrew Dalby 13:45, 6 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
The intro sentence seems to suggest a common name or genus is in mind, not the species ("X is a mammal of the caviid family originating from one or many of the species of the genus Cavia"). It looks like it was written when the page was still at a page that could be about cavies in general, but wasn't rewritten when the page was moved to Cavia porcellus in particular. (The history doesn't support this hypothesis, though—I can't tell how this sentence came to be at all.) —Mucius Tever 19:16, 7 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)